a. revenue tariff----------------a 6% tariff on oranges to provide money for the government.
Revenue tariff alludes to a set of rates planned for expanding public revenue. It can likewise be said as a tax exacted on import and fare to fund-raise for the government. Revenue tariff is any schedule or arrangement of rates or changes that are proposed to create income for the government.
b. protective tariff---------a 50% tariff on oranges to shield domestic orange growers from international competition.
Protective tariffs are tariffs that are established with the point of ensuring a domestic industry. Tariffs are likewise forced keeping in mind the end goal to raise government income, or to decrease a bothersome action. In spite of the fact that a tariff can all the while secure household industry and procure government income, the objectives of assurance and income augmentation recommend distinctive duty rates, involving a trade off between the two points.
c. retaliatory tariff-----------a 200% tariff on oranges to reply to a high tariff imposed by another country.
Retaliatory tariff refers to a tariff imposed as a methods for constraining a foreign government and expected to urge the give of correspondence benefits.
Retaliatory tariff is a tariff imposed to pressure another nation into evacuating its own tariffs or making exchange concessions.
Answer:
Speakers who make direct eye contact with the audience tend to appear as more trustworthy. Delivering speeches fluently by practicing beforehand can enhance a speaker's credibility.
Explanation:
Answer:
A. 122 days
Explanation:
The computation of the cash conversion cycle is shown below:
= DAys sales outstanding + days inventory outstanding - days payable outstanding
where
Days sales outstanding is
= 365 ÷ $2.8 ÷ $0.6
= 78.16 days
The days inventory oustandings is
= 365 ÷ $2.3 ÷ $0.5
= 79.35 days
And, the days payable outstanding is
= 365 ÷ $2.1 ÷ $0.2
= 34.76 days
Now the cash conversion cycle is
= 78.16 days + 79.35 days - 34.76 days
= 122.75 days
= 122 days
E. decrease in both number of shares outstanding and the market price per share
Answer:
C) Wolfe can hold either Harris or the employer or both liable.
Explanation:
Since Harris was acting within the scope of his employment, then he and his employer are liable for the injuries that Wolfe suffered. Wolfe can decide to recover from either of them (generally the employer would be chosen) or from both parties, there is no legal limitation.
It doesn't matter who owns the vehicle, what matters is what was Harris doing at the time of the accident; he was performing tasks on behalf of his employer.
If Wolfe died, Harris could face criminal charges, but his employer still would be liable in a civil case.