Answer:
counter-act one another.
Explanation:
As a bilateral monopoly has one buyer and one seller, the buyer wants to pay the lower price possible and the seller wants to charge a high price. So, they have opposite goals and they have to negotiate considering the power each one has and find an agreement in which both win. According to this, the answer is that in a bilateral monopoly with one buyer and one seller, the monopoly power of the seller and the monopsony power of the buyer tend to counter-act one another as their positions are in conflict and they have to find a middle point to get to an agreement.
The other options are not right because their goals are in conflict so they don't support the idea of the other party and both parties have a relative bargaining power and because of that, the monopoly power of the parties does not favor the buyer or the seller.
Answer:
Equilibrium quantity will increase; Equilibrium price is ambiguous.
Explanation:
If the government removes a tax on the production of beer then as a result the producers of beer will increase their production level and this will increase the supply of beer in an economy. Therefore, there is a rightward shift in the supply curve of beer.
Simultaneously, the students are ready to party in the new quarter which indicates that the demand for beer increases. This will shift the demand curve for beer rightwards.
As a result of these shift in the demand curve and in the supply curve of beer, the equilibrium quantity of beer increases and the effect on equilibrium price of beer is ambiguous because that will be dependent upon the magnitude of the shift in the demand and supply curve.
Answer:
ME should make the investment because it results in not only higher market share but also a $24,000 increase in profits.
Explanation:
Currently ME's marketing expenditures represent 25% of the industry's marketing expenditures and it matches his market share. Using the competitive parity approach, three additional market share points should cost $120,000 ($40,000 for each point) and should increase gross profits to a total of $1,344,000 ($144,000 increase). The difference between incremental revenue and incremental expenses = $144,000 - $120,000 = $24,000.
Answer:
The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.
Explanation:
The appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense can be calculated as follows:
Bad debt expense = (Percentage of accounts receivable not yet due it will not collect * Accounts receivable not yet due) + (Percentage of receivables up to 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables up to 30 days past due) + (Parentage of receivables of receivables greater than 30 days past due it will not collect * Amount of receivables greater than 30 days past due) - Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts (credit) ……………………… (1)
Substituting the relevant values into equation (1), we have:
Bad debt expense = (7% * $7,500) + (20% + $2,300) + (46% * $2,000) - $400 = $3,345.20
Therefore, the appropriate amount of Bad Debt Expense is $3,345.20.
Answer:
A. Ill-conceived goals
Explanation:
Ill-conceived goals refers to setting of goals or incentives in order to promote a desired behavior whereas indirectly encouraging a negative one.
When setting ill-conceived goals, the unintended effects of these goals should duly be taken into consideration.
