1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
nydimaria [60]
3 years ago
11

How did the supreme court help erode African Americans' freedom?

History
2 answers:
kompoz [17]3 years ago
4 0

<span>The Supreme Court helped wear down the freedom of African-Americans after the civil war because it didn't announce many of the laws that were intended to harass African-Americans as unlawful. It even supported separation when it confirmed that the doctrine of separate but equal was a constitutional right.</span>

NemiM [27]3 years ago
3 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

The Supreme Court helped erode African Americans' freedom with its decision on the Dred Scott case and its decision in 1883 of declaring the Civil Rights Act of 1875, unconstitutional.

These decisions severely hurt the civil rights of African Americans in the United States. The Supreme Court also added that the US Congress lacked the authority under the 14th Amendment to give protection to African Americans and that the states were the ones that had the authority to do so.

You might be interested in
Which country gives its citizens the most economic freedom? *
nevsk [136]

Answer: The Netherlands.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Choose any of the bill of rights (amendment 1 -10 of the US constitution). Provide THREE (3) specific arguments IN FAVOR why thi
Serggg [28]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

I am going to choose the First Amendment to the United States Constitution.

The three specific arguments in favor of why this Amendment is necessary in a democratic society are the following.

1.- One of the most important characteristics of modern democratic societies is that citizens are free. Without freedom, there is no democracy.

2.- People have their own set of belief systems and they will always have them. It is intrinsic to human nature. No matter what religion people profess, it is their right.

3.- The right to assemble in a peaceful way to exchange ideas, no matter what kind of ideas, it's part of any democratic government and society in the world.

The two arguments against why this Amendment may no longer be necessary in today's America.

1.- It is so implicit that citizens have rights that will come a day in which this value of liberty would have no need to be part of a Bill of Rights.

2.- Science and the use of logic could be a substitute for the ingraining belief that people need religion to have something to believe in. When science could be able to explain it all through the use of reason, maybe there won't be the necessity to include freedom of religion as part of the Bill of Rights.

6 0
3 years ago
What event provoked the South Carolina Exposition and Protest?
STALIN [3.7K]

Answer/Explanation

The document was a protest against the Tariff of 1828, also known as the Tariff of Abominations. It stated also Calhoun's Doctrine of nullification, i.e., the idea that a state has the right to reject federal law, first introduced by Thomas Jefferson and James Madison in their Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions.

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement expresses the irony of this oarticular kind of corruption to the democratic process
Anettt [7]

The correct answer is "The founders of American Democracy would not have expected corruption in Philadelphia."

The orator appeals to its "Pathos" or appealing to the sentiment of the people who are listening to him by reminding them that under that same hall the "Fathers of American liberty" voted there once.

7 0
3 years ago
Some people told George Bush that he did not have the authority on his own to force Iraq out of Kuwait because
Sloan [31]
Of the restrictions placed on the presidency by the War Powers Act.

The WPA prevents the president from authorizing relations to war without the approval of congress.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who was was the ruler of mali that deflated the value of gold in mecca?
    12·1 answer
  • What does a production possibilities curve represent?
    14·2 answers
  • The part of the constitution that gives congress the authority to make laws to carry out powers granted to congress in the const
    11·1 answer
  • What happened as a result of Charles Sumner's speech that criticized the Kansas-Nebraska Act?
    10·2 answers
  • How does the fourth principle, concerning liberty, connect to the idea that certain guaranteed freedoms in American life are lim
    13·1 answer
  • What was a principal reason for the success of European colonialism in Asia in the late 1800s?
    9·1 answer
  • The conservative party that ruled through the 1980s and early 1990s was replaced by which political party?
    12·1 answer
  • What does frolicsome mean?
    5·2 answers
  • What does this election map show about the impact of the Great Depression on the Election of 1932?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the purpose of the system of checks and balances?​
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!