Answer:
Fueled by the game-changing use of steam power, the Industrial Revolution began in Britain and spread to the rest of the world, including the United States, by the 1830s and ‘40s. Modern historians often refer to this period as the First Industrial Revolution, to set it apart from a second period of industrialization that took place from the late 19th to early 20th centuries and saw rapid advances in the steel, electric and automobile industries.
Explanation:
1 Throw the current policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption into the dustbin. They are ill conceived and cannot achieve their intended or presumptive goal(s).
2 Rethink the Ndegwa Report’s recommendation that allowed civil, public and state officers to engage in private business. The fight against corruption shall never get anywhere so long as we allow this conflict of interest.
3 Constitute a multi-disciplinary think tank, comprising intellectuals and practitioners from various fields, to formulate new policy, legal and institutional frameworks for combating corruption. The think-tank should be wary of an ultra-legal, linear or single-dimension approach to corruption.
4 Grant unconditional amnesty to all corrupt acts and omissions from the colonial days to date. The corrupt are too entrenched, having enjoyed unhindered access to state patronage since the colonial days. Any attempt to fight past corruption will never get anywhere. They will easily overrun the best professional teams from our State Law Office, the Police Service and the DPP. In other words, fight corruption prospectively, with effect from the date of the new policy, legal and institutional frameworks set out in
Answer:
Noooo I would not believe him
Explanation:
Because he's trying to convince you that it's clean water but the truth is, it's not. He might trying to convince you to jump there so that you get dirty and he laugh because you fell on his trap/prank.
<span>It is true when there is an accusation made by an event where there is an alleged guilty, and then that accused person or a witness gives a response, in his story can help to deny or assert the accusation. The most logical thing for the accused is to give answers that deny that accusation and free him from guilt. This is true.</span>
Answer:
In the speech “I will fight no more longer”, it explains that the Indians were treated very badly by the US government. The Indians were thrown out of their native land, forcing them to go somewhere else. It’s stated that the Indians tried to fight back for their land, but failed. Also, the supplies that they had were not enough for all of them, therefore many Indians died along the way to the border of Canada. When the Indians were 40 miles away from the Canadian border, they were stopped by the US government and were forced to surrender. This evidence shows that the US government stole native land, and forced out the natives, along with terrible treatment towards the Indians.
Explanation:
Hope this helps:D ( pls brainliest
