Answer:
D. may ignore Sam's statement and continue asking questions until Sam makes an unambiguous request for an attorney.
Explanation:
Miranda right is also known as Miranda warnings sometimes. It is the right given to a suspect to remain silent and the right to have an attorney.
When an investigator is asking questions to the suspect person for a crime, the Supreme court says that after the suspect waives off the Miranda rights, the investigator can continue to interrogate him until the suspect makes clean and unambiguous request for a lawyer.
Thus in the context, Sam waives off the Miranda rights provided to him and is willing to give answers to the detective's question. But when he is not sure whether he wants a attorney or not, the detective under the Supreme Court rulings, can ignore his request and continue questioning Sam until he makes a clear request to have an attorney for himself.
Hence the answer is--
D. may ignore Sam's statement and continue asking questions until Sam makes an unambiguous request for an attorney.
They are in charge of their own desitiny. They can overcome any obstacles, they just need to work harder, or be smarter.
Under the deficit reduction act, the law allowing states to enact their own <u>state acts</u>, which can bring increased recovery amounts if the act is as strong as the one enacted by the federal government.
<h3>What is the deficit reduction Act?</h3>
Th federal legislation of 2005 grants the states flexibility to modify their Medicaid programs in ways that could negatively affect children and families' access to care.
Also, some of the deficit reduction Act 's provisions allow states to expand eligibility and thus access to services.
Read more about deficit reduction Act
brainly.com/question/25296860
#SPJ1
