Answer:
Not at all.
The group of men who met in Philadelphia were tasked with proposing amendments to the Articles of Confederation … and they could’ve done just that! Likewise, there was a faction within this group that would’ve preffered to establish a constitutional monarchy. In fact, that group might’ve had their proposal adopted if George Washington said yes.
To say that the Constitution was inevitable is to ignore the history of the Revolutionary War, the political intrigues that surrounded the Continental Congress, and the sectional differences of the United States. Indeed, it is probably a misnomer to even call them the United States at that time. Most folks of the era were much more interested in local or state politics. The national government was a political deadend for most politicians at the time.
I also think that one of the most overlooked aspects of the Constitutional Convention was the enormous recognition of human nature that prevaded the delegates. Many had huge egos, and several were morally bankrupt (even by the standards of the day). However, all of them accepted that human nature was imperfect, flawed, and fundamentally sinful. This ultimately led to several compromises that created what we call the Constitution. But, it didn’t have to be this way.
When you stop to consider just how many “lucky” coincidences had to occur to produce this document, it’s very easy to realize that the Constitution was never inevitable and it still isn’t today.
Explanation:
D. Include a wide variety of opportunities
Which question? please elaborate.
Answer:
With this statement, McElvaine meant that social justice is the only way to promote the same privileges to all members of a society and that is what a common good must do.
Explanation:
Commonly, it is the term that refers to benefits that are distributed equally to all members of society, so that they all have access to exactly all the resources necessary for their well-being. When McElvaine claims that common good is best achieved by promoting social justice over economic liberty, she/he meant that only social justice, that is, the view that all individuals deserve the same rights, opportunities and privileges, is capable to promote this equal distribution of social resources. For this reason, social justice must be sought first, so that economic freedom can be achieved later.
