8.876 to the nearest whole number
8.876 can be rounded to 9 because if we have a number greater than 5 we round to next number i.e is 9 but if we have a number smaller than 5 then we round to the previous number that is 8.
So your answer is 9
Its an indirect proof, so 3 steps :-
1) you start with the opposite of wat u need to prove
2) arrive at a contradiction
3) concludeReport · 29/6/2015261
since you wanto prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', you start wid the opposite of above statement, like below :- step1 : Since we want to prove 'diagonals of a parallelogram bisect each other', lets start by assuming the opposite, that the diagonals of parallelogram dont bisect each other.Report · 29/6/2015261
Since, we assumed that the diagonals dont bisect each other,
OC≠OA
OD≠OBReport · 29/6/2015261
Since, OC≠OA, △OAD is not congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
∠AOD≅∠BOC as they are vertical angles,
∠OAD≅∠OCB they are alternate interior angles
AD≅BC, by definition of parallelogram
so, by AAS, △OAD is congruent to △OCBReport · 29/6/2015261
But, thats a contradiction as we have previously established that those triangles are congruentReport · 29/6/2015261
step3 :
since we arrived at a contradiction, our assumption is wrong. so, the opposite of our assumption must be correct. so diagonals of parallelogram bisect each other.
Answer:(c)
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
The initial value of Adam's model is 
the value increases exponentially with the rate of 
Time period 
Final amount 
Exponential growth is given by
Putting values
Option (c) is correct
Let
x-----------> <span>uniform width surrounding the picture
we know that
(10+2x)*(12+2x)=224-----> 120+20x+24x+4x</span>²=224
4x²+44x+120-224=0
4x²+44x-104=0
using a graph tool-----> to resolve the second order equation
see the attached figure
the solution is
x=2 in
the answer is2 inches
