The one shortcoming of all four theories (market-oriented, dependency, world-systems, and global commodity chains) of global inequality is that The theories underemphasize the role of women in economic development.
<h3>What is global inequality?</h3>
Since many decades ago, inequality has increased all throughout the world. There are now fewer people in several nations who are extremely poor. However, as the richest people gain new levels of wealth, economic gaps have continued to widen. The United States is by far the most affluent among industrialized nations, with the richest 1 percent of citizens receiving the largest proportions of the nation's wealth and income.
<h3>What is women economic inequality?</h3>
Women do the lowest-paying jobs globally. They earn 24 percent less than males do globally, and it will take 170 years to close the pay gap at the current rate of development. There are 700 million fewer women employed than men worldwide. Poor quality of work.
To learn more about economic inequality visit:
brainly.com/question/17056304
#SPJ4
I assume you wish to know about James Marcia's identity development statuses in his identity status interview research
Answer and Explanation:
James Marcia notes four unique identity developmental statuses faced by individuals:
Forclosure: is status of individuals who do not explore alternatives and merely make commitments such as based on what their parents want
identity diffusion: is the status of individuals who have not considered the need to search for an identity and therefore have no commitments or tried to explore any alternatives. These individuals are known to face no identity crisis and no anxiety problems as they have not gone into identity development
Moratorium: individuals here are in an identity crisis as they have began to explore alternatives and commitments are more or less defined. These individuals face anxiety as search for identity.
Identity achievement: here individuals have been able to find identity and have made commitments after having faced the previous stages and now have an internal definition of identity.
Answer:
Bargaining power of suppliers
Explanation:
Porter's Five Forces was a tool developed by Michael Porter in 1979. Michael Porter was a professor at the Harvard Business School.
This tool is, since then, used as an important framework to analyze the competition level in the market.
The five forces that are developed by Porter are:
- Threat of new entrants
- Bargaining power of suppliers
- Bargaining power of buyers
- Threat of substitute products
- Rivalry among existing competitors
<u>In the given case, the least impact of locating four other trucks of Hop Dog in the quad is the bargaining power of suppliers.</u>
The Bargaining power of suppliers is the force according to which suppliers analyze its power and control to the possibility of raising their prices and lowering the quality of the product.
<u>In the given case, Hop Dog's four more trucks are located in the quad and the supplier power had the least effect on it because the competition of the supplier in the area was nil which might have given Hop Dog's suppliers to raise their prices and low their quality product and still earn profit.</u>
So, the correct answer is suppliers power of the bargaining power of suppliers.
if this is true or false then the answer will be false
Answer and Explanation:
Foreign entanglements can create alliances that stimulate the production of products and services in a country, through the creation of commercial agreements, where the production and sale of the product and services, will move the local economy, reduce unemployment and provoke a movement of money within the country, improving the economy and allowing more international trade agreements to be established.
These foreign entanglements can also create economic sanctions, where the production of products and services and the sale of a country, is highly impaired and often blocked, which damages a part of a country's productive sector, devalues the currency, increases unemployment and harms the local economy. In this way, the aggrieved country is unable to maintain economic relations with other countries, harming the global economy.
