1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kondaur [170]
2 years ago
15

According to the website, why is the history of black americans and their strife for civil rights significant to the history of

the united states?.
History
1 answer:
Kisachek [45]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

black americans and their strife for civil rights significant to the history of the united states

Explanation:

black americans and their strife for civil rights significant to the history of the united states because it affected every black american in the u.s and it was symbolic of the fight for rights for all people.

You might be interested in
Following the United States’ entry into World War II, what did American and British leaders decided was their highest priority?
Setler [38]
<span>invade Europe and defeat Germany.


</span>
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is part of the majority, he or she gets to write the _______.
GrogVix [38]
<span>If the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court is part of the majority, he or she gets to write the _______.
</span>
<span>   C. appeal </span>
8 0
3 years ago
how did delegates to the constitutional convention account for the practice of slavery when calculating representation in congre
zysi [14]

Answer:

A slave had 3/5th of a vote. A regular person had one vote.

Explanation:

4 0
2 years ago
Which of the following was one result of the Treaty of San Stefano? a. Serbia became a country. b. Austria-Hungary became a dual
serious [3.7K]

Answer:B

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which was not an effect of the Tet offensive?
OLEGan [10]
<span>When it was over, the Viet Cong basically ceased to be an effective force any longer. Their ranks were decimated. All of the territory lost during the offensive was shortly won back. But the ability of the Communists to launch such a widespread coordinated offensive convinced the American media and ultimately the American public that the war was now a lost cause and demanded a withdrawal. So, tactically, it was a military success for the U.S. but it served as a public relations success for North Vietnam.


I believe the answer may be </span>
<span>U.S. forces dealt the Vietcong a massive military loss and regained control of all areas that the Vietcong had attacked.</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP
    14·2 answers
  • ( 30 points) Why did direct democracy work in Athens and not the United states?
    8·2 answers
  • What characteristics of New Netherlands as described by Joques set it apart from the English colonies to the North and South?
    13·1 answer
  • If historians were to use the info in this list to gain a better understanding of life in the 19th century for women what would
    11·1 answer
  • Why have historians referred to the Mediterranean Sea as a "Roman lake
    6·2 answers
  • Which describe Phoenician traders
    13·1 answer
  • How has technology changed weather forecasting for meteorologists?
    13·1 answer
  • How did ancient Greek and Roman texts contribute to the rise of humanism in Italy?
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following best states a similarity between Samuel Adams and Patrick Henry?
    7·2 answers
  • How many votes does the Senate need to approve of conviction in Articles of Impeachment?
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!