Answer:
Judges may be removed by the governor upon the address of the general assembly with the concurrence of two thirds of the members of each house.
Explanation:
Answer:
True.
Explanation:
The given statement would be considered true as it asserts a true claim about J.S. Mill's 'principle of liberty' denying the conception of 'victimless crime'. He stated that individual actions should only be restricted when it is causing damage to others. He proclaimed that "the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others". In simple terms, he stated that no one should be prevented from doing a specific action unless his/her actions are not invasive or harmful to the other's rights. Therefore, the given assertion is <u>true.</u>
I am assuming you are asking about sexual intercourse.
In prior years, particularly High School years, the topic isn't talked about a whole lot. Students usually leave with the anatomy of pleasure parts instead of the knowledge of how to pleasure their partner.
Watching adult videos online is most likely unrealistic. Some people don't realize that in those videos, those adults are professionals and not everyone acts like the way they do in bed.
Some students may find the topic hard to talk about. We are told of unrealistic beauty standards at a young age, and eventually how our parts are "supposed" look like. They are also fed very little about the information on how you can achieve climax; some people do things differently.
Growing up, students might experience times where they are hinted that sexual intercourse is shameful. Most students, therefore, feel discouraged to ask questions.
The topic of same-sex intercourse is also quite untouched. Negative stigma is often floating around constantly and would make students interested in the same sex to be discouraged to talk to others about the topic. They, therefore, often reserve to online adult videos which gives them the perception of unrealistic standards.
Answer:
Anyone can be nominated to serve in the Supreme Court.
Explanation:
The Constitution does not set forth any qualifications for a Supreme Court Judge nor do any laws. Thus the President can nominate anyone to serve in the Supreme Court.
_____________________________________________________
Hoped that helped! If so, mark me Brainliest!
