Answer: d. double-blind
Explanation:
A double blind study can be define as the study in which both the researcher and participant do not know which participant is receiving a particular treatment. This method is useful as it prevents the bias in the results of the experiment.
The given situation is the example of double-blind study. Here, the participants as well as the researcher do not know which group of subject are receiving bacteria in the yogurt and which group is not receiving.
Reusing or sharing needles, really anything that can be spread through blood and drugs.. i hope this helps and sorry its so brief.
Answer: This is a deductive argument, because the truth in the first premises which states: if you get at least 8 hours of sleep a night, you show up to the office 10 minutes early for work. Has validate the conclusion that state: I know for a fact that I was early to work Monday through Friday, so I must have slept at least 8 hours every night.
The underlying reason why the conclusion is valid is because, the conclusion affirms the first premises (P1).
The conclusion can only be valid in this argument if it affirms either P1 or P2.
ANOTHER ARGUMENT WITH THE SAME PATERN IS:
P1: If it rains the soil will be wet.
P2: If it does not rain the soil will not the wet.
Conclusion: it rained, therefore the soil is wet.
Could it be Birth control?