1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Lostsunrise [7]
3 years ago
10

I need help with this-!

Law
2 answers:
Oksana_A [137]3 years ago
3 0
1. The difference between the two is that one is specific to certain people and not talking about all of the people and I use the word tranquility in the constitution to show peace




2 because they are trying to make a free world of independence and so they want to be collective to everyone and be more peaceful.

3
A By making checks and balances to limit the government branches power
B and by creating federalism Which means that the states had too much power over the government and so they switched it so the government could force taxes and in force treaties
jeka943 years ago
3 0
What my boy above me said ✊✊✊✊✊✋☝☝✌
You might be interested in
Anh/chị hãy đưa ra những bình luận về tính kế thừa và phát triển của chức năng nhà nước qua các kiểu nhà nước?
Zinaida [17]
D. This is scetionn2
5 0
3 years ago
What is not a requirement of a valid marriage?
lesya [120]
The first questions answer is c
6 0
3 years ago
If one school walks to another school what is the schools shoe size?
Hitman42 [59]
It’s actually 9.5 bro
3 0
3 years ago
How can you prove that a documents presented to you is a public documents ?​
Dovator [93]

Answer:

Public Documents are proved by Secondary Evidence. Private Documents are proved by original i.e. Primary Evidence. The certified copy of a public document is to be admitted in judicial proceedings. The secondary evidence of the original document is not to be admitted in judicial proceedings.

6 0
3 years ago
Gautreaux v. Chicago housing authority was a class action suit that alleged that public housing was, in effect.
borishaifa [10]

Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority class action lawsuit that alleged public housing was serving de facto govt. segregation. -gave $ to families to help buy homes in suburbs. as a result, happier, healthier, children had higher test scores.

About case :

The case began in 1966, when Dorothy Gautreaux and others filed a class action claiming that the Chicago Housing Authority (“CHA”) had intentionally perpetuated racial segregation both in its tenant assignment practices and in its siting policies.   In 1969, the district court found for the plaintiff class, Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Auth.,

Who is Dorothy Gautreaux?

Dorothy Gautreaux was a community and civil rights activist who lived in public housing on Chicago's South Side, and fought against their unjust policies. Under the guidance of ACLU lawyers, Gautreaux and 3 other residents sued the Chicago Housing Authority in the nation's first public housing desegregation lawsuit.

Learn more about Gautreaux vs. Chicago Housing Authority :

brainly.com/question/28161937

#SPJ4

5 0
1 year ago
Other questions:
  • People accused of crimes and awaiting trial may be released from custody if they agree to stay under house arrest. pay bail. lea
    11·2 answers
  • After learning about some of the duties of a forensic investigator, what do you think would be the most rewarding part of the jo
    12·1 answer
  • What happens if country is a hybrid legal system
    10·1 answer
  • The resolution of a civil case prior to going to trial is called
    14·1 answer
  • 1. What is urban violence? What are some of its other names?
    5·1 answer
  • What role does the vice president serve in the executive branch?
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following individuals may be required to undergo HIV testing ? a ) Employees of a small business with limited healt
    5·1 answer
  • Ha hatdog djiuef ok.
    8·2 answers
  • Many states do not require licensing of unarmed security personnel but often cities and counties do require
    9·2 answers
  • 13. The "strict scrutiny" standard invalidated certain affirmative action policies whose focus was not narrow enough.
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!