According to Sporre, it was during the 18th century that a differentiation between fine art and applied art began to take shape.
This distinction can be traced back to philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau who argued that there is an inherent difference in talent between artists who paint landscapes versus those who create portraits or figure sketches.
<h3>When was the separation of the fine and applied arts encouraged?</h3>
In the 18th century, Sporre argues that the values of an era encouraged the division of fine and applied arts.
He states that during this time period, people were more interested in practical applications than artistically-oriented endeavors.
This was due to advances made in science and technology, which allowed for things like machines, weapons, transportation systems etc to be developed and manufactured.
As a result of this emphasis on practicality, art became less important as it did not immediately have utilitarian value.
Taking account of both aesthetic and functional aspects simultaneously became something considered innovative or even daring which set the scene for later developments within the fine arts such as symbolism and abstractionism.
To learn more about applied and fine arts, visit:
brainly.com/question/14339622
#SPJ4
The answer has to be A because the North had thought it was wrong to own slaves
Answer:
defining the problem is the most important step because the rest of the process depends on it.
Explanation:
According to my research on the marketing research process, I can say that based on the information provided within the question defining the problem is the most important step because the rest of the process depends on it. Without knowing exactly what the problem is you can not plan accordingly and come up with marketing solutions to solve it. Therefore, you can not continue to finding the objectives and creating the marketing design.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
