Height because dependent variable is the measurement
The inverse, converse and contrapositive of a statement are used to determine the true values of the statement
<h3>How to determine the inverse, converse and contrapositive</h3>
As a general rule, we have:
If a conditional statement is: If p , then q .
Then:
- Inverse -> If not p , then not q .
- Converse -> If q , then p .
- Contrapositive -> If not q , then not p .
Using the above rule, we have:
<u>Statement 1</u>
- Inverse: If a parallelogram does not have a right angle, then it is not a rectangle.
- Converse: If a parallelogram is a rectangle, then it has a right angle.
- Contrapositive: If a parallelogram is a not rectangle, then it does not have a right angle.
All three statements above are true
<u>Statement 2</u>
- Inverse: If two angles of one triangle are not congruent to two angles of another, then the third angles are not congruent.
- Converse: If the third angles of two triangle are congruent, then the two angles are congruent to two angles of another
- Contrapositive: If the third angles of two triangle are not congruent, then the two angles are not congruent to two angles of another
All three statements above are also true
Read more about conditional statements at:
brainly.com/question/11073037
Answer:
T=4B+10C
Step-by-step explanation:
for every bag there are 4 doughnuts
for every carton there are 10 doughnuts
Answer:
step 2
and then also in step 3 compensating the error in step 2
Step-by-step explanation:
I think I just answered this for another post.
sin(a - b) = sin(a)cos(b) - cos(a)sin(b)
so, step 1 is correct :
sin(A - 3pi/2) = sin(A)cos(3pi/2) - cos(A)sin(3pi/2)
but step 2 suddenly and incorrectly switched that central "-" to a "+".
yes, sin(3pi/2) = -1, but that is still an explicit factor in step 2. so it was not used to flip the central operation from subtraction to addition, and therefore this change was a mistake.
then, in step 3, another error was made by just ignoring the "-" sign of "-1" and still keeping the central "+" operation. this error compensated for the error in step 2 bringing us back by pure chance to the right result.
The bottom answer m y = m h
