Answer
The term “evidence,” as it relates to investigation, speaks to a wide range of information sources that might eventually inform the court to prove or disprove points at issue before the trier of fact. Sources of evidence can include anything from the observations of witnesses to the examination and analysis of physical objects. It can even include the spatial relationships between people, places, and objects within the timeline of events. From the various forms of evidence, the court can draw inferences and reach conclusions to determine if a charge has been proven beyond a reasonable doubt.
Considering the critical nature of evidence within the court system, there are a wide variety of definitions and protocols that have evolved to direct the way evidence is defined for consideration by the court. Many of these protocols are specifically addressed and defined within the provisions of the Canada Evidence Act (Government of Canada, 2017).
In this chapter, we will look at some of the key definitions and protocols that an investigator should understand to carry out the investigative process:
Explanation:
Im pretty sure it can either be E or B
Answer:
B
Explanation:
A theory is a carefully thought-out explanation for observations of the natural world that has been constructed using the scientific method, and which brings together many facts and hypotheses.
Answer: Oliguria, requires dialysis if symptoms persist
Explanation:
After an ultrasound examination of the kidney is conducted, and the individual in question is a man, it is a standard procedure that if the urine output level is below 500 mL per 24h in adults it is diagnosed as Oliguria.
The decrease in output of urine may be as a result of dehydration (loss or removal of water from the body).
