Bolivar stood apart from his class in ideas, values and vision. Who else would be found in the midst of a campaign swinging in a hammock, reading the French philosophers? His liberal education, wide reading, and travels in Europe had broadened his horizons and opened his mind to the political thinkers of France and Britain. He read deeply in the works of Hobbes and Spinoza, Holbach and Hume; and the thought of Montesquieu and Rousseau left its imprint firmly on him and gave him a life-long devotion to reason, freedom and progress. But he was not a slave of the Enlightenment. British political virtues also attracted him. In his Angostura Address (1819) he recommended the British constitution as 'the most worthy to serve as a model for those who desire to enjoy the rights of man and all political happiness compatible with our fragile nature'. But he also affirmed his conviction that American constitutions must conform to American traditions, beliefs and conditions.
His basic aim was liberty, which he described as "the only object worth the sacrifice of man's life'. For Bolivar liberty did not simply mean freedom from the absolutist state of the eighteenth century, as it did for the Enlightenment, but freedom from a colonial power, to be followed by true independence under a liberal constitution. And with liberty he wanted equality – that is, legal equality – for all men, whatever their class, creed or colour. In principle he was a democrat and he believed that governments should be responsible to the people. 'Only the majority is sovereign', he wrote; 'he who takes the place of the people is a tyrant and his power is usurpation'. But Bolivar was not so idealistic as to imagine that South America was ready for pure democracy, or that the law could annul the inequalities imposed by nature and society. He spent his whole political life developing and modifying his principles, seeking the elusive mean between democracy and authority. In Bolivar the realist and idealist dwelt in uneasy rivalry.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation or most commonly referred to as CPR is administered as an emergency procedure and combines chest compression for artificial ventilation. Those who received this before the arrival of the emergency personnel are more likely to survive. Thus, the answer is the second choice.
Americans are better at recognizing anger, fear, and sadness compared to Japanese but accuracy for happiness or surprise does not differ.
Japanese people tend to shy away from overt displays of emotion, and rarely smile or frown with their mouths Yuki explained because the Japanese culture tends to emphasize conformity humbleness and emotional suppression, traits that are thought to promote better relationships. May 10, 2007
In a large number of studies,3, 8, 9 some aspects of emotion have been shown to be culturally different because emotion is not only biologically determined but also influenced by environment and social or cultural situations. The role of culture in emotion experience has also been stressed in sociology theories.
Learn more about Japanese here
brainly.com/question/510537
#SPJ4
Idk for sure but ik it was a lot of miles
