Answer:
In-kind benefit
Explanation:
In-kind benefit refers to a form of benefit that is usually provided by employers as a part of your Salary arrangement. There are several Example of in-kind benefits that're usually common in United States, such as : Subsidized housing, Foods provided by the company, employees group insurance, gas money, and relocation expenses.
In United States, In-kind benefit usually subjected to the same rules as insurance regulation. But an exception will be made if the employer provided the in-kind benefit through ERISA (Employee Retirement Income Security Act)
Answer:
declarative;non-declarative
Explanation:
Explicit memory: In psychology, the term explicit memory is also referred to as declarative memory, and is considered to as a subdivision of the long-term memory. It needs intentional or conscious thoughts in an individual, for example, recalling naming an animal that he or she has seen yesterday.
Implicit memory: In psychology, the term implicit memory is also referred to as non-declarative memory and is one of the subdivisions of the long-term memory that can not be recalled consciously or intentionally by an individual. It helps an individual to perform skills, habits, and automatic behavior, for example, cycling.
This is true. The Chief Executive is the President of the United States of America. He is known as the Chief Executive because he is the head of the Executive branch of government. The United States government was formed with the principle of separation of powers in mind. This means that government power should not be centralized in just one official or one branch (like the British monarchy in the Medieval and Renaissance era). This is done to lessen the chance for abuse in the government. The executive branch is mainly concerned with the implementation of laws. The legislative is in-charge of writing and creating the national laws. The judiciary (courts) is primarily there as a check for the powers of the executive and legislative branch. They make sure both branches do not abuse their powers and gives citizens the avenue to air out their grievances.
Answer:
A. liable to Will only if the company was grossly negligent
Explanation:
<em>Astor Manufacturing cannot be strictly responsible for Will's injuries since the cause of the accident was the earthquake</em> (C), not because of a company error.
Although the company fulfilled its duty to have the equipment to ensure that the chemicals didn´t explode,<em> it could become responsible so they actually exploded</em> (B)
In the fragment <u>"Jason" is never mentioned as someone who has voluntarily assumed the risk of injury</u>, option (D) makes no sense like an answer.
Therefore, Astor Manufacturing would be liable to Will only if the company had been seriously negligent. This was not the case, <em>but it should also be investigated why the latest generation equipment did not prevent chemicals from exploding.</em>
Answer:
d at lease I tried desk he is in Lagos now
