According to line 6, how long will Richard Lowther’s indentured servitude last? About four years.

History

1 answer:

jekas [21]1 year ago

5 0

Richard Lowther's indentured servitude was to last for 4 years.

Indentured servants:

were mostly English people who pledged to served a master in the Americas
transported to the Americas by a master who they would work for to pay off the debt of bring brought to the Americas
would eventually gain their freedom after some time

Richard Lowther signed an indentured servitude agreement in 1627 with Edward Hurd Cittizen by which he pledged to become an indentured servant for a period of 4 years as shown in the attached document below.

In conclusion, Richard Lowther became an indentured servant in 1627 and if all went well, was free of service in 1631.

<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/4850869. </em>

You might be interested in

How did the Vikings impact

olga_2 [115]

Answer:

In the centuries after their first raid on English soil in A.D. 793, Vikings made a historic series of attacks, waged wars and formed settlements in the British islands, leaving a permanent impact on the land, culture and language

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Which of the following best describes a consequence that Specie Circular had in the United States?

rodikova [14]

It caused widespread panic and started a depression. <span>
</span>

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

What roles did the feudal system manor system and Catholic Church play in medieval life

Ket [755]

The manor system was important because people lived on feudal ground owned by rich land owners. Those people were tightly connected to the catholic church and they all swore their allegiance to the pope. The people were all religious and they worked on the land and could keep a part of what they produced but they had to give a part to the manor owner. The owner would provide protection in return.

7 0

3 years ago

Did anyone do this??

SashulF [63]

I don't know, did I?
You probably should though if your teacher tell you to.
Need to be the goody two shoes.

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

5. As part of the Dred Scott decision, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney argued in 1857 that Congress could not prohibit someone from

Nataly_w [17]

Answer:

A. slaves were not citizens of the United States.

Explanation:

Dred Scott decision was a watershed decision ruled by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1857. A suit was filed in the court by Dred Scott demanding his freedom from slavery. He claimed that since his owner took him to free state Illinois from Missouri, and died there, Dred considered himself a free slave. But was brought back to slavery under Missouri Compromise Act. In 1857, the Chief Justice Roger B. Taney ruled that Dred Scott is a slave, and the term 'citizen' does not apply to slaves, therefore, none of the rights provided for citizens of the US apply to Dred Scott.

Therefore, the correct answer is option A.

5 0

2 years ago