D) a caption to help the viewer understand the picture that they are looking at.
Answer/Explanation:
The logical fallacy presented is an ad hominem. The statement tries to prove that voting yes on stadium tax will make you a good person. Those of the opposing argument would have been "unloyal" citizens. This argument proves feelings rather than facts making it an ad hominem.
The phrase, "Voting on the stadium tax is the duty of every loyal citizen" is a true statement. However, adding voting "yes," specifies it to one side. The author then takes it a step further stating "in fact, it is the test of whether you are a good neighbor." In the long run, this implies that if you vote against us, you are a bad person.
I dont quite understand, Please re-fraise ?
Answer:
<h3>The transfer of certain governmental activities to private sector and enterprise would greatly serve the needs of the citizens is believed by both the excerpts and is one of the similarities between them.</h3>
Explanation:
The transfer of certain governmental activities to private sector and enterprise would greatly serve the needs of the citizens is believed by both the excerpts and is one of the similarities between them. This can be seen in the way how Wilson supports privatized agencies that cater to external entities such as politicians. He says that non privatized government agencies “must serve goals not of the organization's own choosing” because catering to citizens can be best catered by private agencies.
Similarly, Edward supports a similar concept like Wilson when he advocates that government should "move activities to the private sector, where they can… be an organic part of society connected to the actual needs of citizens”. Through this statement, he implies that government sector does not effectively provide services to the actual needs of the citizens.
The one contradicting element between these two concepts is that Wilson talks about the transfer of governmental activities to private sector in general and mostly aims on changing the ideas of government agencies, whereas, Edwards reflects his concept in the case of U.S and other countries which have adopted privatization successfully.
