The question is incomplete. This is the complete question:
The state trial court in Nevada has issued a decision in which a party has been found guilty of fraud. Should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada courts will be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision.
Answer:
No, should a case arise in the future with the same basic fact situation, Nevada state trial courts will not be bound by precedent to follow the reasoning and decision of this prior decision, because the decisions of trial courts do not use precedents or rulings established in previous legal cases to arrive at decisions on future disputes involving different or entirely new parties.
Answer:
yes you have the right answer
The fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a result of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.
<h3>What is a constitution?</h3>
Constitution is a legal document, which contains the principles and procedures by which a country is being governed.
Hence, the fact that state governments are required to enforce restraining orders placed on stalkers and batterers in other states is a result of the full faith and credit clause of the Constitution.
Learn more about constitution here : brainly.com/question/470736
#SPJ1
No
republican super majority
lobbying
many times people in government vote for something because their allies are voting for it/they feel pressured
Explanation:
There's a sign that says Public property on the grass, but yet another person walked on the grass.
