All categories

2 years ago

A 2-for-1 stock split increases the marketability of the stock because.

1 answer:

Nutka1998 [239]2 years ago

7 0

The reason why a stock-split of 2-for-1 can be said to increase a stock's marketability is that the market price for each share decreases.

<h3>What does a 2-for-1 stock split do?
</h3>

When a stock is split in this manner, it means that there will now be two stocks for every stock there was before.

This means that the price of every stock will be halved. This increases marketability because the lower market price makes the stock cheaper for people to buy.

Find out more on stock splits at brainly.com/question/14247504.

You might be interested in

Zoey Bella Company has a payroll of $9,440 for a five-day workweek. Its employees are paid each Friday for the five-day workweek

Ratling [72]

Answer:

Dr Salaries expense $7,552

Cr Accrued salaries $7,552

Being entries to record salaries payable as at year end

Explanation:

When an expense is incurred but yet to be paid by an organization, the entries required are

Dr Expense (p/l)

Cr Accrued expense (B/s)

when payment is made

Dr Accrued expense (B/s)

Cr Cash account

Given that Zoey Bella Company has a payroll of $9,440 for a five-day workweek and the year ends on a Thursday. As such, the company as at 31 December has incurred salaries for 4 days. This has to be accrued for but first to calculate the amount

= 4/5 * $9,440

= $7,552

Hence adjusting entry required on December 31, assuming the year ends on a Thursday

Dr Salaries expense $7,552

Cr Accrued salaries $7,552

Being entries to record salaries payable as at year end

7 0

3 years ago

The _______ transport of auxin establishes the orientation of growth; the _______ redistribution of auxin causes a growth respon

Novosadov [1.4K]

This is the complete sentence: the polar transport of auxin establishes the orientation of growth, the lateral redistribution of auxin causes a growth response to an enviromental stimulus that is called morphogenesis.<span />

5 0

3 years ago

At January 1, 2020, Windsor Company had plan assets of $303,000 and a projected benefit obligation of the same amount. During 20

Arte-miy333 [17]

Answer:

The answer is well illustrated as below

Explanation:

Remember: Five factors affects the Pension Liability and Plan assets.

1 & 2. Expenses which includes service cost and interest cost

The increase in expense always increases the pension liability so the entry would be:

Dr Service cost $27,100

Dr Interest Cost $30,300 ...... $303,000 Opening Pension Liability * 10%

Cr Pension Liability $57,400

3. Actual return increases the Plan Asset

The Actual return on investment received would increase the Assets worth, which means the journal entry must be passed which would increase the Investment Value (Plan Asset). So the entry would be:

Dr Plan Asset $25,700

Cr Actual return $25,700

4. Contributions made increases the Plan Asset because it is an increase in the investment.

So the journal entry would be:

Dr Plan Asset $20,000

Cr Cash Asset $20,000

5. The benefits paid to employees are decrease in both pension asset and the pension liability. (We had actually borrowed money from the employees and had invested that money so paying off the benefits actually decreases the pension liability and assets).

So the double entry would be:

Dr Pension Liability $17,700

Cr Pension Assets $17,700

Kindly input the above values in the following worksheet:

4 0

3 years ago

2020 Under what conditions is it ethically defensible to outsource production to the developing world where labor costs are lowe

fomenos

Answer:

Morally, how about we start with business morals. Extensively business morals spin around progressively the estimation of the business to investors or partners (contingent upon the type of private enterprise). In the event that redistributing work diminishes costs and converts into expanded benefits for the organization, that is sufficient to consider it in accordance with the all-encompassing order of the business whether or not there is a decrease in cost for the buyer.

Is it morally wrong to use innovative advances to build creation productivity when request in a market is generally inelastic? Cultivating used to be 40% of American employments. Presently it's generally 2% but then out creation has developed.

Long haul the pulverization of a class of business is regularly counterbalanced by the formation of another classification the requires increasingly psychological assets. Actually, whole new enterprises can be made. So it is additionally not so much exact to restrict your view to simply the individuals who are dislodged from their occupations. It is completely conceivable that the net impact on the economy is sure.

Be that as it may, again morals are increasingly emotional and have to do with the type of private enterprise to which one buys in, political way of thinking, and perspective on social duty of business.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

The geometric average return answers the question What was your return in an average year over a particular period?

Andreyy89

Answer: A. What was your average compounded return per year over a particular period?

Explanation:

Geometric return is calculated by the formula;

= [(1 + r1) * (1 + r2) * (1 + r3) *.... (1 + rn)] ^1/n

This allows for one to calculate the compounding effect over a period of time by showing the compounded annual growth rate which means that it tells what the average compounded return was per year in a particular period.

6 0

3 years ago