Answer: d. mike cannot disaffirm because he has already ratified the contract
Explanation:
When signing deals it's important to consider long term, this helps to make the best decision in any and most scenario. Most deals signed too cannot be reversed or change or adjusted because it'll affect the policy of the organization and won't be health for them. Mike has agreed to buy a property through a spread payment plan, changing the deal now after some years will not be possible as it distorts the plan intially agreed and goes against the policy of the organization selling the home.
Answer: D
Explanation:
The ability to make sound, timely decisions during an emergency is critical. Effective decision making can ,Avoid tragedy ,help manage incidents.
build community trust and support.
help the community recover from an event more quickly. Conversely, poor decision making or the absence of decisions potentially can result in injury or death to victims and/or responders.
Answer:
![A = 28000 [\frac{0.12 (1.12)^4}{(1.12)^4 -1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20A%20%3D%2028000%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.12%20%281.12%29%5E4%7D%7B%281.12%29%5E4%20-1%7D%5D)
![A = 28000 [\frac{0.12*1.574}{1.574-1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20A%20%3D%2028000%20%5B%5Cfrac%7B0.12%2A1.574%7D%7B1.574-1%7D%5D)
So then the annual pay would be $ 9218.564 for this case
Explanation:
For this question we can use the Equivalent annual value (A) given by the following expression:
![A = PV [\frac{i (1+i)^t}{(1+i)^t -1}]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%20A%20%3D%20PV%20%5B%5Cfrac%7Bi%20%281%2Bi%29%5Et%7D%7B%281%2Bi%29%5Et%20-1%7D%5D)
Where 
represent the pesent value
since the rate is yearly
since we have 4 years to pay
So then we have everything to replace and we got:
So then the annual pay would be $ 9218.564 for this case
And this amount would be paid each year in order to pay all the money after 4 years.
Answer:
a. people face tradeoffs.
Explanation:
Tradeoffs means sacrificing something in order to achieve another thing.
Firms are sacrificing some of their profits in order to have an healthier and cleaner environment.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Yes, there is a violation of the Equal Pay Act because Hank's salary ($14 per hour) is higher than Marjorie's ($12 per hour).
Explanation:
The Equal Pay Act of 1963 basically establishes that no employer can pay a higher salary to an employee of one sex and pay a lower salary to an employee of the opposite sex. Theoretically this law protects both women and men, since the provision doesn't establish a specific sex that is protected.
In this case, it is OK for Ellen to earn a higher salary than Hank because she has more experience and she was transferred to the New York facility. But Hank shouldn't earn a higher salary than Marjorie because she is a more experienced worker.
This law doesn't consider the differences between Ellen's salary and Marjorie's.
