Answer:
At age one, Glenda's baby would cry less because she would know that crying does not lead to a reward and therefore learn to use the tactic less often.
On the other hand, Ruthie's baby will learn that crying leads to love and care and therefore that behavior will be associated to receiving comfort and attention.
Therefore Glenda's theory that picking up a crying baby will reinforce the crying and the child will become harder to care for, has shown better results.
Hi!
Your answer is B.
It is <u><em>not</em></u> A because this doesn't really make sense. It's not the best answer.
It <u><em>is</em></u> B because, in sentences, the words around it will likely give the information you need to infer what the word means.
(For example, if I were to say "<em>She was </em><u><em>continuously</em></u><em> singing, for yesterday she sang for 4 straight hours, and it was extremely annoying</em>", pretend you do not know what "continuously" means. By using the words around it, such as "4 straight hours" you can predict that it means "never stopping".)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> C because not every single sentence contains a synonym or antonym.
(See the sentence above. The antonym of "continuously" would be 'never' or 'sometimes' or possibly 'discontinous'. There isn't always an antonym or synonym there, is there?)
It is <u><em>not</em></u> D because not every single word is defined in a passage.
(When you open an average book, is there just an entire page(s) dedicated to every single definition of a word? Most often, no, there is not.)
Hope this helps<span> eustress</span>
An etymologist studies <span>the origins of words. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option. The other choice given in the question are incorrect and can be easily negated. I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has actually come to your help.</span>
Answer: Option E - All of the above
Explanation:
The Chief Justice of supreme court,
Warren E. Burger, affirmed Miller's conviction and concluded that the material were obscene since it depicts sexual conduct in artistic way, lack literary, politics, scientific value, violates "global standards of decency", and also encourages lewd and lascivious thought.