the amount of interest you are charged on credit card purchases.
Hope this helps.
Answer:
quid pro quo
Explanation:
Since in the given situation, it is mentioned that there is an unpleasant behavior when the supervisor alluded that the new manager would not spend much time away from work
So here the type of sexual harassment would be called as quid pro quo as it deals with the advantage in return for something
Therefore the same would be considered
Answer:
E) She was not invited to regular Friday staff lunches with the guys
Explanation:
Discrimination refers to unequal or unfair treatment owing to forming a prejudice against an individual. It could be on account of an individuals race, sex, nationality, caste, etc.
The federal law strictly prohibits any sort of job discrimination on the grounds of age, sex, religion, nationality, color, etc.
In the given case, of all the scenarios mentioned, the one which would be regarded as discriminatory would be, the employee not being invited to regular Friday staff lunches with the guys unlike other employees.
This conveys inequality towards the employee and amounts to a discriminatory practice, which would justify her filing a lawsuit against it.
The stock market declined and it started the great depression
<span>Because this couple is stated to have three small children I am assuming that Alan and Laura are under 50 years old. The annual maximum contribution for 2017 allowed is 5,500 for people under 50. They are allowed up to 1,000 as a catch up contribution as well if they are in fact over fifty.</span>