Answer:
Weeks supply = 10.70 million (Approx)
Explanation:
Given:
Last year, cost of goods sold = $7,537.53 million
Last year Inventory = $1,551.55 million
Computation:
Average cost of sold good on week basis = Cost of goods sold / Total number of weeks
Average cost of sold good on week basis = $7,537.53 million / 52
Average cost of sold good on week basis = 144.96 million
Computation of weeks supply:
Weeks supply = Last year Inventory / Average cost of sold good on week basis
Weeks supply = $1,551.55 million / 144.96 million
Weeks supply = 10.70 million (Approx)
The correct answer is A) $392,000.
The amount should be reported in its 2015 income statement as the current portion of its provision for income taxes is $392,000.
To get this number you have to do the correct multiplication. You take the taxable income and multiply it by the enacted tax rate of the year 2015. So it is $1,400,000 x .28 (that is the 28%. The resulted number is $392,000.
This is how the corporation has to prepare the reconciliation for its first operation year.
The other options of the question were B) 560,000. C) 504,000. D) 720,000.
When a company buys something on credit it increases account payable, and when a company sells on credit it will increase their account receivable.
Answer:
Assets increase by $5,000 increase, equity decrease by $5000
Explanation:
The accounting equation is expressed as below.
Assets = Liabilities + shareholders equity
- Assets are valuable items that the business owns.
- Liabilities are the debts of the business.
- Shareholder equity is the owner's capital, plus the retained earnings.
The transaction by Celery Company involves buying supplies valued at $5000 by cash.
- Since celery paid cash, no liabilities were incurred. The shareholder money (Equity) decreased by $5000.
- Supplies worth $5000 were acquired. The suppliers belong to the business; they are valuable items( assets) to the business.
In this scenario, we have committed an error related to Procedural justice
Procedural justice refers to way of ensuring fair justice by making decisions according to fair processes to ensure fair treatment.
According to this justice rule, the same rule must be applied to similar scenario and must be impartial as well in order to ensure fair justice.
In conclusion, we have committed an error relating to procedural justice because the rule that was <em>applied to Julio </em>was <em>not applied to John</em>, therefore, there was a bias in justice.
Read more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/10925598</em>
