A dictatorship is a form of government where one person, usually called a dictator, controls every part of the government. Usually in these settings, human rights are infringed.
Have a nice day! :)
If your thinking logically then you would want to tax the use of the common pasture. Doing that would limit the amount of sheep in the pasture itself. Because the number of sheep go down then the sheep still there will have an abundance of food. It can't be number 3 and I don't think its 1 so using my logic it would be 2. Hope this helped!
Answer:
Nubia and Ancient Egypt had periods of both peace and war. It is believed, based on rock art, that Nubian rulers and early Egyptian pharaohs used similar royal symbols. There was often peaceful cultural exchange and cooperation, and marriages between the two did occur. Egyptians did, however, conquer Nubian territory at various times. Nubians conquered Egypt in the 25th Dynasty.
Egyptians called the Nubian region “Ta-Seti,” which means “The Land of the Bow,” a reference to Nubian archery skills. Around 3500 BCE, the “A-Group” of Nubians arose, existing side-by-side with the Naqada of Upper Egypt. These two groups traded gold, copper tools, faience, stone vessels, pots, and more. Egyptian unification in 3300 BCE may have been helped along by Nubian culture, which was conquered by Upper Egypt.
Nubia was first mentioned by ancient Egyptian trading accounts in 2300 BCE. Nubia was a gateway to the riches of Africa, and goods like gold, incense, ebony, copper, ivory, and animals flowed through it. By the Sixth Dynasty, Nubia was fractured into a group of small kingdoms; the population (called “C-Group”) may have been made up of Saharan nomads.
During the Egyptian Middle Kingdom (c. 2040-1640 BCE), Egypt began expanding into Nubian territory in order to control trade routes, and to build a series of forts along the Nile.
Yes, Shi Huangdi brought an end to the period of Warring States and created a unified China, both culturally and politically. Shi Huangdi may have unified the area politically and socially with legalist policies and standardization, but he did so by destroying culture using oppressive tactics.
Answer:
It cost lots of money, corruption wasn't limited.
