All categories

2 years ago

Question 5 of 20

Business

1 answer:

umka21 [38]2 years ago

7 0

When you invest your money, it is likely that in future your purchasing power will A. go up and down.

<h3>What will happen to your purchasing power?</h3>

If you invest your money today, there is a chance that you will get back more money than you deposited, or less than you deposited.

This means that you will either have more money or less money to purchase goods and services. In other words, your purchasing power will go up and down.

Find out more on purchasing power at brainly.com/question/2286004.

You might be interested in

The upper management of a large national retail grocery store has passed along the new goals of improving customer service to th

valentina_108 [34]

Answer:

The correct answer will be "Tactical planning".

Explanation:

Tactical scheduling or planning seems to be an essential factor of commercial enterprise which differs significantly from traditional forms of effective decision-making. The phase of tactical preparation occurs in real-time, following the short-term results.
With nothing more than a tactical approach in place, the company will make fast strategies to excel inside that chosen field of work.

So the above seems to be the correct answer.

3 0

3 years ago

A person has a choice between an apple or an orange. The person chooses the apple. What is the opportunity cost of choosing the

Inessa [10]

The opportunity cost would then be not having the orange.

8 0

3 years ago

Suppose there is a simultaneous increase in demand and decrease in supply, what effect will this have on the equilibrium price?

Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Although the impact on the equilibrium quantity cannot be determined, a rise in demand and a decrease in supply will result in an increase in the equilibrium price. 1. Consumers now place a higher value on goods, and producers must charge a higher price to offer the goods; as a result, prices will rise for all quantities.

If demand increases at the same time as supply increases, as is the case in the scenario depicted, the new equilibrium price will be greater than the initial equilibrium price.

We therefore know that an increase in supply decreases equilibrium price and increases quantity, while a rise in supply increases equilibrium price and decreases quantity (and vice versa) (and vice versa).

To learn more on equilibrium price

brainly.com/question/14480835

#SPJ4

5 0

2 years ago

Why is it difficult to change real capital

Sonbull [250]

Answer:

I don't know

Explanation:

can you help me with my question Enter the coordinates of the point on the unit circle at the given angle. 270° ([?], [ ] Enter

3 0

2 years ago

You are the manager of a firm that manufactures front and rear windshields for the automobile industry. Due to economies of scal

Leya [2.2K]

Answer:

a. The optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0)

b. Yes, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Explanation:

a. Determine your optimal pricing strategy if you and your rival believe that the new Highlander is a "special edition" that will be sold only for one year.

Note: See the attached excel file for the Representation of one shot normal for of the game played between "You" and "Your Rival" together with the payoffs.

From the attached excel file, the dominant strategy is for “You” and “Your Rival” to charge “Low Price” each. If the dominant strategy is played by “You” and “Your Rival”, the optimal pricing strategy will be one-shot Nash equilibrium in which “You” charge low price, “Your Rival” charge low price and then the payoff is ($0, $0).

b. Would your answer differ if you and your rival were required to resubmit price quotes year after year and if, in any given year, there was a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander? Explain.

When we have a year-after-year competition between “You” and “Your Rival” but with a 60 percent chance that Toyota would discontinue the Highlander, the payoffs of the firm that continue to comply with the collusive strategy of charging “High Price” by each firm under the normal trigger strategy whereby “You” and “Your Rival” agree to charge high price as long as there is no past deviation by any of the firm, otherwise charge a low price is as follows:

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 + $6(100% - 60%) + $6(100% - 60%)^2 + 6(100% - 60%)^2 …….

$\pi ^{Cooperate}$ = $6 / 6% = $10

Therefore, what the firm that cheats earn today is $11 million and it earns $0 forever. The implication of this is that $\pi ^{Cheat}$ = $11

Therefore, the anwer will differ becuase it is not possible to sustain the collusive outcome as a Nash equilibrium because $\pi ^{Cheat}$ > $\pi ^{Cooperate}$ .

Download xlsx

7 0

3 years ago