Answer:
attention
Explanation:
Listening refers to the skill in the process of communication to correctly receive and interpret messages. It plays a crucial part in classroom communication between educators and students. Active listening requires listening through all senses. That means speaker full attention of the listener is crucial so that the speaker will make sure that what they are talking about is of interest to the listener.
Ummm because a king rules and a president has a legislative system so no one takes to much power
The answer to the blank space in the question is levels of analysis. Levels of analysis refers to how <em>a researcher can use multiple approaches (there are three commonly used one: biological, cognitive, and sociocultural) to explain a psychological phenomenon. </em>
For example, when explaining the concept of memory, a researcher can refer to how the process occurs in the brain (biological), how the process occurs in the mind (cognitive), and how our surroundings influence the type of memory that we encode in the brain (sociocultural).
Answer:
Leaders of the established 1966 military coup, including army officers Colonel E.K. Kotoka, Major A. A. Afrifa, Lieutenant General (retired) J. A. Ankrah, and Police Inspector General J.W.K. Harlley, justified their takeover by charging that the CPP administration was abusive and corrupt. They were equally disturbed by Kwame Nkrumah's aggressive involvement in African politics and by his belief that Ghanaian troops could be sent anywhere in Africa to fight so-called liberation wars, even though they never did so. Above all, they pointed to the absence of democratic practices in the nation—a situation they claimed had affected the morale of the armed forces. According to General Kotoka, the military coup of 1966 was a nationalist one because it liberated the nation from Nkrumah's dictatorship—a declaration that was supported by Alex Quaison Sackey, Nkrumah's former minister of foreign affairs.[1]
Despite the vast political changes that were brought about by the overthrow of Kwame Nkrumah, many problems remained. For example, the underlying ethnic and regional divisions within the society had to be addressed. The apparent spirit of national unity that seemed to have developed during the Nkrumah years turned out to have resulted in part from his coercive powers as well as from his charisma. As a consequence, successive new leaders faced the problem of forging disparate personal, ethnic, and sectional interests into a nation with shared identity and interests. The economic burdens, aggravated by what some[who?] described as past extravagance, crippled each future government's ability to foster the rapid development needed to satisfy even minimal popular demands for a better life. The fear of a resurgence of an overly strong central authority continued to dominate the constitutional agenda and to pervade the thinking of many educated, politically minded Ghanaians. Others, however, felt that a strong government was essential.[1]
A considerable portion of the population had become convinced that effective, honest government was incompatible with competitive political parties. Many Ghanaians remained committed to non-political leadership for the nation, even in the form of military rule. The problems of the Busia administration, the country's first elected government after Nkrumah's fall, illustrated the problems Ghana would continue to face.[1
You have to answer this question yourself, since it is personal.
