1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
icang [17]
2 years ago
13

Both the samurai and knights generally fought on horseback. Who would have been in the most trouble if he was knocked from his h

orse or his horse was killed? Explain your thinking.​
History
2 answers:
Jet001 [13]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

If a samurai fell in a puddle or water it would be hard to fight because the armor absorbs the water and becomes heavy. Also a knight's armor weighs 40 to 60 pounds.

Explanation:

To get you started on your answer

leonid [27]2 years ago
5 0

Both the samurai and knights generally fought on horseback.

  • The Samurai armors were made of metal and was put together with leather and silk.
  • The armor was made in a way so that samurai can move freely using their swords.
  • The knights armor were made of steel plate and were very popular during the 15th century.
  • According to researchers, the knights armors weighed 30 to 50 kilograms.
  • To run or fight the knights have to use twice the amount of energy from normal soldier with no armor.
  • For a knight it will be most trouble if he was knocked from his horse or his horse was killed.

Thus we can conclude that the answer will be <em>the knight as their armor is heavy compared to Samurai.</em>

Learn more about  samurai here:

brainly.com/question/15672578

You might be interested in
All of the following were long term causes of the World War 1 EXCEPT
Reptile [31]
<span>B. Religious Differences</span>
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What fate did Benjamin Franklin fear if the colonist did not unite to repel the french and indians?
Maru [420]
Benjamin Franklin feared that if the colonists did not unite to repel the French and Indians, then the colonies would be forever "split," since the French would take more and more land to the east, along the coast. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please give me the answers you know
GuDViN [60]
1. Triple alliance
2. The Axis of Evil or <span>The Central Powers
4. the war that resulted was called the world war 1
turned out to be a long war</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Which of these is NOT a criticism of the concentric zone model?
Ganezh [65]
The second one isn't criticism, it's just a fact.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!!
pshichka [43]

The fall of Constantinople began with capture of the Byzantine empire's capitol by an invading Ottoman army. This downfall took place May 29, 1453, and is believed to mark the end of the Medieval period. The conquest of Constantinople also greatly impacted Christiandom, as the Muslim Ottoman armies were left unchecked.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • A type of sailing used by early explores was a carvel
    5·1 answer
  • What did the practice of containment mean?
    7·1 answer
  • Which european power was first to establish permanent colonies in the americas
    8·1 answer
  • What was the experience of trench warfare like for the typical soldier in World War I
    5·1 answer
  • A producer can provide cable service more cheaply than another producer.
    10·1 answer
  • The location of Nubia allowed the Nubians to
    13·2 answers
  • How we’re free blacks and slaves the same
    10·2 answers
  • Which of the following were women not involved with during the Civil War?
    10·1 answer
  • What is the aclu? plz help​
    10·2 answers
  • Drag each label to the correct category.
    5·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!