Answer:
The largest revenue the supplier can make under this deal is $24,151.2
Explanation:
Working file has been attached to help understand how the answer was derived. Some points to note in the sheet are:
- The sheet represents the following columns which are S. No., Chairs, Price, Total Revenue and difference in each revenue.
- As the no. of chairs rises the price is dropping by $0.2 in the entire order.
- However, at first this increase in order of chairs is beneficial even with the drop in the price of entire order.
- At the point, where chairs ordered are 348 and price is $69.4 the revenue is at its largest which is $24,151.2.
- After this point the increase in the no. of chairs is only decreasing the overall total revenue of the supplier.
<span>The simple answer here is you never want to over commit any part of your portfolio. Every single successful investor has a wide variety of investment holdings. This is known as diversification. If you place all of your "eggs in one basket," so to speak, if that investment were to play against you, your losses may be much higher than anticipated or often irrecoverable. With a diverse portfolio, when one small portion of your investment strategy fails, you can count on other, more successful aspect to make up the difference.</span>
Answer:
AFS 2004 market price decline exceeded 2005 market price recovery
No No
The security cannot be classified as available-for-sale because the unrealized gains and losses are recognized in the Income Statement. Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are recognized in owners' equity, not earnings.
The second part of the question is somewhat ambiguous. The 2004 price decline could exceed or be exceeded by the 2005 price recovery. The loss in the first year is not related in amount and does not constrain the realized gain in the second year.
The way to answer the question is to read the right column heading as implying that the earlier price decline must exceed the later price recovery. With that interpretation, the correct answer is no.
For example, assume a cost of $10 and a market value of $4 at the end of the first year. An unrealized loss of $6 is recognized in earnings. During the second year, the security is sold for $12. A realized gain of $8 is recognized-the increase in the market value from the end of the first year to the sale in the second year. Thus, the market decline in the first year did not exceed the recovery in year two. (It could have exceeded the recovery in year two but there is no requirement that it must.)
Explanation:
Solution:
Inventory 21,320 debit
A/P 21,320 credit
--to record purchase from Game Girl --
Inventory 360 debit
Cash 360 credit
--to record the freight-in--
A/P 1,560 debit
Inventory 1,560 credit
--to record returned goods to GameGirl--
A/P 19,760 debit
Inventory 395 credit
Cash 19,365 credit
--to record payment to GameGirl--
accounts receivables 17,360 debit
sales revenues 17,360 credit
COGS 8,406 debit
8,406 credit
--to record sale and subsequent cost of the sale--
total amount of the purchase in dollars:
82 game devices x 260 dollars each = 21,320
six returned devices:
6 x 260 = 1,560
invoice balance: 21,320 - 1,560 = 19,760
discount because payment within the first ten days:
19,760 x 2% = 395
final value: 19,760 - 395 = 19,365
sale of 62 devices at 280 = 17,360
