Answer: The Break-Even Point will reduce from $4,285.71 to $4,125
Explanation:
To get the Break-Even Point we can divide Fixed Assets by the Contribution margin.
The Contribution Margin is the Selling Price minus the Variable Cost.
For Scenario 1 the Break-Even Point will be,
= 15,000 / ( 6 - 2.50)
= $4,285.71
For Scenario 2 the Break-Even Point is,
= 16,500 / 6.5 -2.5
= $4,125
The Break-Even Point for Scenario 2 means that even though the higher Fixed Costs could have led to a higher Break-Even Point, the higher price contributed more than the fixed costs did and led to an ultimately lower Break-Even Point than the first Scenario.
Answer:
The correct answer is B
Explanation:
Price elasticity of the demand evaluates the demand responsiveness after the change or variation in the product own price.
The formula for computing the coefficient of price elasticity, is the factors which affect the elasticity and also elasticity is vital for business when deciding the prices.
So, Filet mignon(F) sells for $20 per pound when compared to that of hamburger (H) which sells the product for $2.30 per pound. F have the higher price as compare to the H, therefore, the coefficient of the price elasticity of demand in absolute value will be high or larger for F than that of H.
Answer:
b. both firms will reduce their price.
Explanation:
The Nash equilibrium is a decision-making theorem that lies inside the game theory where the player could attain the expected result by not deviating to the beginning strategy. In this, the strategy of the each player is optimal at the time when the other player decisions are relevant
So as per the given situation, both the firm should decrease their price
hence the option b is correct
