The difference between a divine command view and authoritarian view is that the authority figure is different-Yes the statement holds true
Explanation:
<u>In a Divine Command of View</u>
we often come across statement like -"I would do what God or the scriptures say is right'
As per this point of view the right and wrong are determined by a supernatural supreme being, whose will we discern from sacred texts and divinely inspired messengers.
<u>Authoritarian View</u>
An example of Authoritarian view is sentence like " I would follow the advise of an authority"
According to this view the right and wrong is decided by the authorities.The power of taking decision rest in the hands of a particular authority.
Downside of this view is that : authorities do not always reflect wisdom and not all authorities agree.
As you can see that the difference between the two view point is the authority figure.So the answer is True
Answer:
If Jenny doesn’t earn any interest on her savings and wants to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, how much will she consume every year?
Jenny's total income during her life = income as tax analyst ($60,000 x 10) + income as PhD student ($12,000 x 5) + income as Art Director (35 x $95,000) = $3,985,000
she generated income during 50 years and expects to live 20 more, so in order to perfectly smooth consumption across her life, she must divide her total life income by 70 years = $3,985,000 / 70 years = $56,928.57 per year
What might prevent her from perfectly smoothing consumption?
First of all, besides inflation, you also earn interest on your savings. That is why 401k and other retirement accounts work so well (the magic of compound interest). Even if inflation and interests didn't exist, you cannot know exactly what you are going to earn in the future and for how many years. In this case, she earned $60,000 for 10 years, but then earned only $12,000 during 5 years. If she really wanted to smooth her consumption, she would have needed to get a loan because her savings during the first 10 years wouldn't be enough.
Answer: The correct answers are "a. invests in international trade or investment." and d. needs to manufacture products or provide services that target a global market.".
Explanation: A company that engages in international business is one that trades goods, services, technology or physical and / or human capital globally.
This means that instead of existing and developing in separate national markets, it unites and transforms them into a single global market through the elimination of barriers between borders.
Well i guess there arent any options...but it wold most likely result in more people buying them but in a negative light paying people who get them less and the supplies they need to do so overall harder to get, but with more people buying a demand for it would be higher, and you can take what you want out of my answer i could go on for a while
Answer:
The economic costs are the sum of the explicit costs or monetary costs, and the implicit costs, or opportunity costs.
The explicit or monetary costs that Felix has are:
Payments to manufacturer: $476,000
Wages and utility bills: $281,000
Total monetary costs: $751,000
The implicit or opportunity costs that Felix is incurring are:
Rent he would get for his showroom: $71,000
Salary he would get as an accountant: $34,000
Total opportunity costs: $105,000
Total economic costs: $751,000 + $105,000 = $856,000
