According to the case, the use of Ph.D. on the ads for hair care products by John Smith is considered an example of the fallacy of inappropriate expertise.
The provided statement is true.
<h3>What is a fallacy?</h3>
A fallacy is an unlawful statement that is used by someone in stating any reasoning or argument which can even be harmful to society.
In the given case, John is having Ph.D. degree in the archaeology field, and his attempt to use the word Ph.D. on the haircare goods marketed by him would be a fallacy in respect of inappropriate expertise. The fallacy could be the use of the Ph.D. word on ads and the inappropriate expertise is that he doesn't have any knowledge regarding skincare and dermatology area.
Therefore, this may create a harmful effect on the individuals who are buying them as it is not authorized by a dermatologist.
Learn more about the fallacy in the related link:
brainly.com/question/2516239
#SPJ1
Ian is a uniquely good position here: the truth happens to be one of the best explanations he could possibly give. The fact that he quit his job to look after his sick mother, assuming that his former employer has positive things to say about him, is a solid reflection of his character and a sign that he was out of the job market not due to a lack of options, but a need to take care of a sick family member.
Ian should tell the truth, and explain the decision thoroughly to demonstrate the kind of person he is to the prospective employer, and what his priorities are.
Answer:
5.5%
Explanation:
The underwriting spread = $0.66 per share
the percent underwriting spread = ($0.66 / $12) x 100 = 5.5%
The underwriting express is the fee that the underwriter of the stock (usually an investment bank) will charge the company for carrying out the transaction, either an IPO or simply issuing more stocks.
Answer:
$5.59
Explanation:
Calculation to determine the value of the entity multiple of Company X in Year 1
Using this formula
Entity multiple=Market value / EBITDA
Let plug in the formula
Entity multiple=$99,450/$17800
Entity multiple=$5.59
Therefore the value of the entity multiple of Company X in Year 1 will be $5.59
Answer:
The correct option is A,Debit Land and Building, $130,000; Credit Common Stock, $5,000; Credit Paid-in Capital in Excess of Par Value, Common Stock, $125,000.
Explanation:
The sum of the two market values of both land and building is $130,000($100,000+$30,000),which would be debited to land and building account to show that the asset has increased due to new acquisition.
In the common stock account the par value of the shares which is $5,000($1*5000) would be credited to it.
The difference between the market value of assets acquired and the common stock amount which is $125,000($130,000-$5,000) would be credited to paid in capital in excess of par account.
