Answer:
a. 1 Pound/1.29 or 0.78 Pound/Mark
b. Overvalued
Explanation:
a. What should the pound-mark exchange rate be in 2012?
Ratio of Pacifica pound to Atlantica mark in 2012 = 360/280 = 1.29
Or,
Ratio of Atlantica mark to Pacifica pound in 2012 = 280/360 = 0.78
Therefore, according to the relative purchasing power parity (PPP) theory, one Pacifica pound should equal to 1.29 Atlantica mark, i.e. 1 Pound/1.29 Mark.
This can also be stated differently that 1 Atlantica mark should equal to 0.78 Pacifica pound, i.e. 0.78 Pound/Mark.
b. If the actual pound per mark exchange rate is 0.5 pound/mark in 2012, is the mark overvalued or undervalued relative to its PPP value
Since the PPP pound per mark exchange rate value estimated in a above is 0.78 Pound/ Mark is higher than the actual pound per mark exchange rate of 0.5 pound/mark in 2012, mark is therefore overvalued.
We can actually deduce here that early access to medical care, from ems through reperfusion, improves overall outcomes by: B. Faster access to medications that increase blood clotting.
<h3>What is EMS?</h3>
EMS refers to Emergency Medical Services. It is actually known to be a system whose responsibility is to provide emergency medical care. The EMS is focused on providing emergency medical care for patients who have serious illness or injury.
The options that complete the question are:
A. Increased access to social support services
B. Faster access to medications that increase blood clotting
C. Delaying onset of hypothermia
D. Saving more heart tissue from cell death
We see here early access of medical care from ems through reperfusion, improves overall outcomes by faster access to medications that increase blood clotting.
Learn more about EMS on brainly.com/question/15043841
#SPJ1
Answer:
(i) They are readily understood even by those unaccustomed to reading charts or those who are not chart-minded.
(ii) They posses the outstanding advantage that they are the simplest and the easiest to make.
(iii) When a large number of items are to be compared they are the only form that can be used effectively.
Answer:
(g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products
Explanation:
Data given in the question
Increase in price of typical soda = 10 cents
Total consumed = 150,000 sodas [er day
Dropped quantity = 75,000 sodas
So by considering the above information, the per day compensating variation of the tax varies from 0 and - 7,500
Since the sugar sweetened sodas is treated as a normal goods. Moreover, people can substitute the other goods also if there is an increase in a price of the good
The -7,500 is come from = (-75,000 × 0.10)
The options are as follows
(a) Greater than -$15k because soda is a luxury good with income (b) -$15k because that is the old consumption level times the value of the tax (c) Between -S7.5k and -$15k because soda is a luxury good elasticity > 1 with income elasticity >1 (d) Between -$7.5k arti -$15k because residents can substitute to other products (e) -$7.5k because that is the new consumption level times the value of the tax ()-$7.5k because that is the change in consumption times the value of the tax (g) Between 0 and -S7.5k because residents can substitute to other products (h) Between 0 and -$7.5k because because beverages are typically necessity goods with 6) Nothing because there was no effect on income G) It is impossible to say without knowing consumers' marginal rate of substitution income elasticity less than 1
