It’s the second one
(Send extra money each month)
Hope this helps!
Answer:
181,500 units
Explanation:
Given that
Beginning work in progress inventory = 20,000 units
The department completed and transferred = 165,000 units
Ending period = 22,000 units
Percentage of completion = 75%
The computation of equivalent units is given below :-
Work in progress of ending period
= 22,000 × 75%
= 16,500 units
So, the equivalent units
= 165,000 + 16,500
= 181,500 units
The adoption of interchangeable parts is the statement that directly explains the boost in production of mccormick reaper.
<h3>What is
mccormick reaper?</h3>
The mccormick reaper is a mechanical mechanism that was created by Cyrus McCormick for farmers to harvest crops mechanically.
In conclusion, the adoption of interchangeable parts is the statement that directly explains the boost in production of mccormick reaper.
Read more about mccormick reaper
<em>brainly.com/question/487638</em>
Answer:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 per bottle. Of this amount, the burden that falls on consumers is $3 per bottle, and the burden that falls on producers is $2 per bottle. True or False: The effect of the tax on the quantity sold would have been larger if the tax had been levied on producers.
Explanation:
The amount of the tax on a bottle of wine is $5 ($3 + $2).
The burden on consumers is $3 ($9 - $6), which is the difference between the after-tax purchase price and the before-tax purchase price for consumers. This implies that the burden passed to consumers is $3 out of the total tax burden of $5.
The burden on producers is $2 ($6 - $4) which represents the difference between before-tax selling price and the after-tax selling price for the producers. This means that the burden passed to producers is $2 out of the total tax burden of $5.
If the tax burden were passed to the producers alone, the selling price would have been more than $11 ($6 + 5). This would have reduced demand for wine as consumers would have been forced to bear the total burden. This would have made the tax unequitable. This would have been the case unless demand is inelastic. That means that the total demanded is not sensitive to price increases.
