After taking $45 billion in taxpayer funding to remain afloat, Citibank spent $50 million on a new private jet. this action was: unethical
What was the intention of taxpayer funding?
The taxpayer funding means that Citibank was granted a funding relief with taxes paid by the taxpayers to avert a collapse of the bank and to ensure the wider economy is not impacted negatively by the failure of a "too big to fail bank" such as the Citibank
The fact that funds meant to keep the bank liquid and to be able to continue smooth operations by having the required cash to meet obligations and they were diverted meant that directors at Citibank have acted unethically.
Find out more about government intervention on:brainly.com/question/13921660
#SPJ1
Answer:
As with all probability sampling methods, simple random sampling allows the sampling error to be calculated and reduces selection bias. A specific advantage is that it is the most straightforward method of probability sampling.
Answer:
22222222222222222222222222222
Explanation:
Answer:
General Specialty Pharmacy
Sales $1,400,000 $600,000 $420,000
Variable cost $520,000 $360,000 $280,000
Contribution margin A $880,000 $240,000 $140,000
Fixed Expenses B $510,000 $420,000 $290,000
Net income/(Loss) (A-B) $370,000 ($180,000) ($150,000)
Answer:
Company B (transaction d)
Explanation:
present value of transaction a (company D) = $1,100,000 / 1.08 = $1,018,519
present value of transaction b (company C) = $45,000 x 21.21211 (PV annuity factor, 2.4%, 30 periods) = $954,545
present value of transaction c (company A) = $1,000,000
present value of transaction d (company B) = $100,000 x 10.52141 (PV annuity factor, 4.8%, 150 periods) = $1,052,141