Answer:
b. one that might have affected the outcome of a case.
Explanation:
A reversible error is an error of sufficient gravity to warrant reversal of a judgment on appeal. It is an error by the trier of law (judge), or the trier of fact (the jury, or the judge if it is a bench trial), or malfeasance by one of the trying attorneys, which results in an unfair trial. It is to be distinguished from harmless errors which do not rise to a level which brings the validity of the judgment into question and thus do not lead to a reversal upon appeal.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
I think this is right its been so long since I did this test
Depends on the situation does the women has a history of being aggressive
Answer:
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel. However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.
Answer:
The Steer Clear law is when there is an emergency on the road and the police, EMTs, firefighters, and towing and recovery personnel have to be there, when this happens you should stop or pull over to the side. Failing to do either one can result in a 250 dollar fine, fines are doubled along with a 90-day license suspension if this violations happens in the work zones area.
Explanation:
If you need more help with drivers questions like this there is a PA Driver's Manuel
