Answer:
Advantages:
- It is easier for people to choose an option rather than to write an essay. The questionnaire reflects what the person is thinking and what the person's point of view is, which as a result makes it easier to analyze and conclude results
- A wide range of questions can be asked within one questionnaire, which makes it an effective way to conduct a survey/test
Disadvantages:
- A person has to read carefully in order to answer each question and sometimes there is lack of concentration by the person filling in the questionnaire
- It is slightly difficult to write an effective questionnaire, that would able to test a vast knowledge/ conduct a survey so that an effective analysis can be done
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
<u>The next year population is 122,689</u>
Step-by-step explanation:
<u>The computation of the next year population is as follows:</u>
<u>= This year population × increase percentage</u>
<u>= 119,000 × (1 + 0.031)</u>
<u>= 119,000 × 1.031</u>
<u>= 122,689</u>
<u>Hence, the next year population is 122,689</u>
<u>The above formula is applied so that the correct value of the population could come</u>
<u>and the same is relevant</u>
- Hope this helped! ^ω^
Answer:
The slope intercept form is y=1/6x+1
Step-by-step explanation:
The true statement for f(x) = 2(3)^x is the y-intercept is (0, 2).
<h3>How to determine the true statement?</h3>
The function is given as:
f(x) = 2(3)^x
Set x = 0 to determine the y-intercept
f(0) = 2(3)^0
Evaluate
f(0) = 2
This means that the y-intercept of f(x) = 2(3)^x is (0,2)
Read more about y-intercept at:
brainly.com/question/14180189
#SPJ1
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
