1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
babunello [35]
2 years ago
11

Năm 1980, ông A kết hôn với bà B có 3 người con là C (1983), D (1990) và E (2005). C đã lập gia đình, D bị tật nguyền. Năm 2020,

ông A chết. Trước khi chết ông A có lập di chúc chia đều tài sản cho C và D. Bà B lo mai táng cho ông A hết 50 triệu đồng. Ông A và bà B có khối tài sản chung là căn nhà trị giá 2 tỷ, ngoài ra ông A còn có khối tài sản riêng trị giá 1 tỷ. Chia tài sản của ông A, biết rằng khi ông A chết có anh T (22 tuổi) đến nhận là con riêng của ông A. *
Law
1 answer:
konstantin123 [22]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

huh? hjsjusnahsusknsusjsnhsiqmanysiendggsins

You might be interested in
Perhaps the aspect of internal investigation that has instigated the greatest amount
melisa1 [442]
Currently available genetic test panels have no proven value for choosing antidepressant treatment, and their use risks providing inappropriate care. So, while gene testing can be very useful for some other conditions, notably some cancer treatments, that success does not yet apply in treating depression.
6 0
3 years ago
What does the Supreme Court have the power to do?
Ipatiy [6.2K]

Answer:

A lot!

Explanation:

Supreme Court Background

Article III of the Constitution establishes the federal judiciary. Article III, Section I states that "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish." Although the Constitution establishes the Supreme Court, it permits Congress to decide how to organize it. Congress first exercised this power in the Judiciary Act of 1789. This Act created a Supreme Court with six justices. It also established the lower federal court system.

The Justices

Over the years, various Acts of Congress have altered the number of seats on the Supreme Court, from a low of five to a high of 10. Shortly after the Civil War, the number of seats on the Court was fixed at nine. Today, there is one Chief Justice and eight Associate Justices of the United States Supreme Court. Like all federal judges, justices are appointed by the President and are confirmed by the Senate. They, typically, hold office for life. The salaries of the justices cannot be decreased during their term of office. These restrictions are meant to protect the independence of the judiciary from the political branches of government.

The Court's Jurisdiction

Article III, Section II of the Constitution establishes the jurisdiction (legal ability to hear a case) of the Supreme Court. The Court has original jurisdiction (a case is tried before the Court) over certain cases, e.g., suits between two or more states and/or cases involving ambassadors and other public ministers. The Court has appellate jurisdiction (the Court can hear the case on appeal) on almost any other case that involves a point of constitutional and/or federal law. Some examples include cases to which the United States is a party, cases involving Treaties, and cases involving ships on the high seas and navigable waterways (admiralty cases).

Cases

When exercising its appellate jurisdiction, the Court, with a few exceptions, does not have to hear a case. The Certiorari Act of 1925 gives the Court the discretion to decide whether or not to do so. In a petition for a writ of certiorari, a party asks the Court to review its case. The Supreme Court agrees to hear about 100-150 of the more than 7,000 cases that it is asked to review each year.

Judicial Review

The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v. Madison (1803).

In this case, the Court had to decide whether an Act of Congress or the Constitution was the supreme law of the land. The Judiciary Act of 1789 gave the Supreme Court original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus (legal orders compelling government officials to act in accordance with the law). A suit was brought under this Act, but the Supreme Court noted that the Constitution did not permit the Court to have original jurisdiction in this matter. Since Article VI of the Constitution establishes the Constitution as the Supreme Law of the Land, the Court held that an Act of Congress that is contrary to the Constitution could not stand. In subsequent cases, the Court also established its authority to strike down state laws found to be in violation of the Constitution.

Before the passage of the Fourteenth Amendment (1869), the provisions of the Bill of Rights were only applicable to the federal government. After the Amendment's passage, the Supreme Court began ruling that most of its provisions were applicable to the states as well. Therefore, the Court has the final say over when a right is protected by the Constitution or when a Constitutional right is violated.

Role

The Supreme Court plays a very important role in our constitutional system of government. First, as the highest court in the land, it is the court of last resort for those looking for justice. Second, due to its power of judicial review, it plays an essential role in ensuring that each branch of government recognizes the limits of its own power. Third, it protects civil rights and liberties by striking down laws that violate the Constitution. Finally, it sets appropriate limits on democratic government by ensuring that popular majorities cannot pass laws that harm and/or take undue advantage of unpopular minorities. In essence, it serves to ensure that the changing views of a majority do not undermine the fundamental values common to all Americans, i.e., freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and due process of law.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Dawn was driving down the road when she spotted a one-car accident and a woman named Sarah on the side of the road. Dawn stopped
vazorg [7]

Answer:

c. Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah under the European bystander rule

Explanation:

The bystander rule is a type of rule which states that a person generally has no legal obligation to rescue, save or assist another (victim) who is in danger or at risk, even if the society imposes a moral responsibility to act as such.

This is known as the American bystander rule and is opposite from the European rule which mandates intervention and assistance, the European version of this rule is called the Good Samaritan rule

so under the European bystander/Good Samaritan rule, Dawn would have been obligated to assist Sarah.

6 0
3 years ago
Write True if the concept is correct and False if it is wrong.
kherson [118]

Answer:

1.true

2.true

3.true

4.false

5.true

6.false

7.true

8.false

9.flase

10.false

Explanation:

It is necessary for a force to give impulse for the object to move, achieve speed and acceleration.

The movement can be modified at any time by changing the object's position.

The word "speed" refers to the ability to move quickly. This means that every object with speed has the ability to move very fast.

A reference point can be used to determine if an object is in motion or at rest, but it cannot be used to determine the time traveled by an object.

Anything that remains at rest, that is, remains stationary can be used as a reference point to determine whether another object is at rest or in motion.

The reference point does not need to move with the moving object, it is possible that it will be used even in repayment.

The speed is calculated by the ratio between the displacement (ie distance traveled) of an object and the time spent at that moment.

Objects may have displacements at low speeds, but not zero.

A long distance trip requires more time.

There are several objects on earth that are at rest in relation to different points of reference.

7 0
3 years ago
If you were a defense attorney, what would you want the jurors to know about the limits of forensic evidence?
OlgaM077 [116]

The results indicate that the 10 pieces of evidence mock jurors reported would be most important when deciding a verdict are (in order of importance): (1) DNA, (2) fingerprints, (3) weapon, (4) video records, (5) crime-scene photos, (6) gunshot residue, (7) other bodily secretions, (8) video confession, (9) forensic ...

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Janet, a twenty year old women, applied for a position driving a truck for Federal Trucking Inc. Janet, who is 5'4" tall and wei
    12·1 answer
  • What if you were able to make changes which assisted in the deterrence of prison violence? Discuss what you would change and why
    6·1 answer
  • Which statement best summarizes the relationship between investments and
    8·1 answer
  • Dwi penalties in New Mexico for Interlock
    7·1 answer
  • Who is this boy i want to know
    13·1 answer
  • What type of law does a lawyer who works to protect non-citizens practice? Refugee law Immigration law International law Civil r
    6·1 answer
  • The chart above outlines the relationships central to a social contract. The Declaration of Independence was an action best desc
    14·2 answers
  • Criminal law spells out the rights and duties that exist between individuals. true or false
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how Americans' commitment to<br> freedom led to the creation of the Bill of Rights.
    11·1 answer
  • PLEASE I NEED HELP ASAP!!!
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!