1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kirill115 [55]
1 year ago
9

This is me!

History
2 answers:
belka [17]1 year ago
8 0

After following the instructions, these are my comments.

I doodle for a minute without thinking, following my instincts and feeling free to draw in any direction. Then I draw a square at the back of the paper

1. I compare the two activities in that they allow me to simply express my creativity by following my instinct.

2. What I felt when I was doodling and drawing figures was the following.

  • It made me express myself like never before.
  • I was not restricted to following strict instructions.
  • I felt very creative to just draw what I wanted.

3. Between the two activities, what I think needs certain control or discipline:

  • is when you have to heed instructions in order to get to a determined result.

Otherwise, it is very important to be free to be creative

I conclude that true expression comes from creativity, not from a set of instructions or restrictions.

Freely expressing yourself is a true mark of creativity.

Learn more about this topic here:

brainly.com/question/4121462?referrer=searchResults

irga5000 [103]1 year ago
3 0

ok then that not really a question but okie dokie

You might be interested in
In WWI, which nation did germany support
suter [353]

Answer:  austria

Explanation:

need brainlest

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who was Ludwig van Beethoven
lukranit [14]
Ludwig van Beethoven was a German composer and pianist. He was a crucial figure in the transition between the classical and romantic eras in classical music and is considered to be one of the greatest composers of all time.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following BEST summarizes the overall disagreement between the federalist and anti-federalists?
ivolga24 [154]

You didn't provide us with choices, so I'll simply provide some historical explanation.  The main issue was whether the Constitution needed a Bill of Rights added.

The Articles of Confederation, in place prior to the ratification of the Constitution of the United States of America, had granted stronger authority to the states.  Patrick Henry and other Anti-Federalists were concerned about too much power winding up in the hands of the federal government and its executive branch, thus allowing a small number of national elites to control the affairs of the USA.  They feared this also would diminish the rights and freedoms of individual citizens.

Federalists believed the Constitution itself clearly limited government power and protected the rights of the people.  Nevertheless, the addition of a Bill of Rights, laid out in the first ten amendments to the Constitution, provided  reassurance to Anti-Federalists in the fight over ratification.  The compromise which led to agreement in regard to ratification of the Constitution was called the Massachusetts Compromise, because of major opposition to ratification that had existed in Massachusetts.  John Hancock and Samuel Adams (both of them anti-Federalists) were the ones who helped negotiate the compromise. The anti-Federalists agreed that they would support ratification of the Constitution, with the understanding that recommendations for amendments would follow if the Constitution was ratified.  The Federalists promised to support the proposed amendments, which would outline a Bill of Rights to guarantee protection of specific rights the anti-Federalists wanted specifically asserted in the Constitution.  

The US Constitution was ratified in 1788.  The Bill of Rights was created in 1789 and ratified in 1791.

4 0
3 years ago
The result of the Battle of Bunker Hill was a/an
xxTIMURxx [149]
The right answer is more than likely C because because the British had an inexperienced army. Although the British did inflict significant causalities to the army it was a clear victory for the Americans. 
8 0
3 years ago
Who can serve the longest term?representatives to the nationrepresentatives in the statesenators in the statesenators to the nat
Elis [28]

Answer:

US Representatives serve a two-year term

US Senators serve a six year term

The term length for State Representatives and Senators can vary stste to state

I hope this helps

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which statement explains how a large increase in the price of gasoline would affect a country's economy?
    14·1 answer
  • What would be the best title for this list of countries?
    7·2 answers
  • How did Nubia and Egypt influence one another?
    11·1 answer
  • Which of these did the Mayans figure out?<br><br> eclipses<br> a calendar<br> Dancing<br> Zero
    13·1 answer
  • The Massachusetts 54th Regiment became well known for their heroic attack on
    9·2 answers
  • What are some possible outcomes if you use a word incorrectly in a piece of writing? The reader will misinterpret your writing.
    15·2 answers
  • What was the goal of most americans in the 1950s?
    9·1 answer
  • The main consequence of the appointment of Lanfranc to archbishop in 1070 was an increase in cathedral building
    9·1 answer
  • To overcome opposition to ratifying the Constitution in Massachusetts, Federalists promised to support
    12·1 answer
  • What goals does the international monatary funds today
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!