Answer:
i need more info
Step-by-step explanation:
Slope: 1.5
Work: I used the slope formula method which is y2 - y1/ x2 - x1. After plugging it in, the new equation is 4 - (-2) / 10 - 6. After subtraction, I had gotten 6/4. And when you divide 6/4, you get 1.5
I hope this helps. :)
Answer:
acute: 7, 9
right: 8, 10
obtuse: 5, 6
Step-by-step explanation:
When you have a number of identical calculations to do, it is convenient to do them in a spreadsheet. You only need to enter the formula once and copy it as many times as needed.
The attachment shows the "sum of squares" calculation and comparison to the square of the longest side. When the sum is too small, the longest side is longer than needed for a right angle, so the triangle is obtuse. When the sum is too great, the longest side is too short for a right angle, so the triangle is acute.
We have skipped the tedious arithmetic and shown the results in the attached table.
Answer:
Dont think eh multiplied both sides by 4. That would be the first step.
Step-by-step explanation:
1/4(x+12)=2
multiply both sides by 4
x+12=8
move the 8 to the right side of the equation and change its sign
x=8-12
calculate
x= -4
Sorry for the wrong answer, this is the correct answer for it:
So, f(x)=2x-6 and g(x)=5x+1. First, I will do the f(g(x)), which is f(g(x))=2(5x+1)-6 => f(g(x))=10x+2-6 => f(g(x))=10x-4. And g(f(x))=5(2x-6)+1 => g(f(x))=10x-30+1 => g(f(x))=10x-29. Both of them have the same slope, but f(g(x)) have a greater y-intercept, which make it greater than g(f(x)). For instance, let x=1, so f(g(x))=10x-4 => f(g(x))=10(1)-4 => f(g(x))=10-4 => f(g(x))=6, and g(f(x))=10x-29 => g(f(x))=10(1)-29 => g(f(x))=10-29 => g(f(x))=-19, and 6 is greater than -19, so f(g(x)) is greater than g(f(x)). Hope this help and fix my mistake.