Appropriate course of action for a trainee who has a problem with a mentor is to seek guidance from someone who is senior to the mentor only after a direct conversation with the mentor has no results.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
While most trainee-mentor relationships become steady after 2-3 interactions, there are also the cases in which an effective communication is not established at all. In cases like these, the trainee should talk directly to the mentor about his problems and help understand the mentor what his position is.
Usually, a direct and open discussion works. When it doesn't, the trainee should seek proper guidance from someone who is senior to the mentor is close to his position. An endless back and forth between the trainee and the mentor leading to no conclusion will also waste both of their time. Moreover, the education of the trainee will be compromised in the process. A senior person will help in two ways:
- Provide another perspective and a new approach to making things work between the mentor and the trainee
- Provide trainee with the guidance himself until a new mentor is finalized
Quakers believed in religious freedom.
Puritans believed in only a Christian religon.
Pilgrims completely separated from the church to form new.
Puritans were more upper class and educated when Pilgrims were more lower class and ignorant.
Answer:
A and B
Explanation:
A)high literacy rate due funds allocated to education
B) high percentage of the population engaged in agricultural activity
The answer is: B) It stretched from Texas to Kansas, providing a trail for cowboys and cattle to the railroad.
Before the railroad technology used for animals distribution, the Chisholm trail was a major distribution route for cattle companies in Texas. At that time, Kansas did not have a lot of cattle farms, so the price of the cattle could be 5-10 times higher compared to the price on Texas.
So the cattle companies often hired cowboys to lead the cattle through the Chisholm trail and deliver the products to Kansas and sell them there.
This is an example of checks and balances, a system where each branch of the government keeps the other two in check and prevents one branch form becoming more powerful than another.