1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hjlf
2 years ago
10

Because there was very little investment in education, african colonies

History
1 answer:
swat322 years ago
5 0

Answer:

Had few leaders with government experience.

Hope this Helps!

You might be interested in
Explain the ways mining shaped the West
Paha777 [63]

Answer

1. It set in a process that led to displacement, removal and relocation of the natives

2. Mining rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy

3. Created a rapid urbanization kind of settlement

Explanation

There was a friction between miners and Indians during the rush for Gold mining that resulted into the displacement of the natives. Mining in California rested on the white American talent for claiming legitimacy. This is to say that most of them were newcomers yet it did not prevent them from claiming legitimacy of the place as occupants ignoring natives that had the right to local resources. Mining in the west brought concentrated populations, where the mining patterns of settlements turned out to be the future settlement pattern of the region.


7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe the coming of the Arabs to East Africa (12mrks)​
Contact [7]

Answer:

it k not necessari NN k an

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which best decribes a clan​
svetoff [14.1K]

Answer:

A clan is a group of people united by actual or perceived kinship and descent. Even if lineage details are unknown, clan members may be organized around a founding member or apical ancestor. ... Members may identify with a coat of arms or other symbol to show they are an independent clan.

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
“If a nation is attacked the only recourse is to attack back” Agree or disagree and why?
LUCKY_DIMON [66]
Not really,

It is reliant on the intensity of the attack as well as the power of the attacking nation.
 some countries have been attacked and literally never fought back but surrendered if the attacking nation is more powerful in terms of military power.
in case the intensity of the attack can be absorbed, a country can also opt for diplomacy as war is the ultimate sanction in international relation.
in case the country feels it has the capacity to protect its sovereignty then fighting back is the only option.
 
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following statements is FALSE?
laila [671]

Answer:

C. Segregation continued in the South despite the law and continued for another 100 years after the Civil War.

Hope this helps!

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who did the texans select to lead the volunteer army?
    5·1 answer
  • Sobre quien ejerce el poder de la Constitución​
    8·1 answer
  • A main indicator of the spread of homelessness during the Great Depression was
    6·2 answers
  • What did Roosevelt mean specifically when talked of the "big stick" in "Big Stick Diplomacy"?
    11·1 answer
  • Select the correct answer from each drop-down menu. was an important African American leader of the abolitionist movement. As a
    11·2 answers
  • Which kin-naming system is used by most people in North America today?
    9·1 answer
  • Summarize the results of the early battles in the colonists' fight for independence?
    12·1 answer
  • Which advantages did the British have over the colonists during the American war for Independence?​
    15·1 answer
  • The image shows a series of figures.
    5·2 answers
  • What were some of the warning signs that the U.S. economy may not have been as strong as the stock market indicated?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!