<h3><u>Answer;</u></h3>
Evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings.
<h3><u>Explanation</u>;</h3>
- <em><u>Scientific argumentation is a stage of scientific inquiry in which scientists make claims, based on observable evidence, and then clarify with justification of the evidence as relevant to the claims.</u></em>
- <em><u>It is therefore, an important part of scientific inquiry as it aims evaluate the validity and reliability of processes and findings. Scientific claims from an investigation should be based on evidence that is justified based on the claims.</u></em>
Animals need to consume food in order to obtain energy (just like humans.
The main site of red blood cell production is the liver.
Answer: D. His conclusion is flawed because he did not test the students to see if their bodies contained metal arsenic.
Explanation:
According to the given situation, student has tested seven different areas around the school to determine the presence of arsenic in the soil and also found the presence of arsenic in the school system. But has not studied the presence of arsenic in the students to support the fact that the school students are also affected by arsenic. So, conclusions based on the presence of arsenic in the soil and the system is inconclusive for the present study.
