In the Cleveland custom cabinets case, the owner of the company thought it was all right to manipulate the financial statement numbers primarily because he was the sole owner of the company and controlled the board of directors.
But, the sole owner is for my part answerable for all debts incurred by using the enterprise." Examples of sole owners encompass small corporations which include, a local grocery keep, local garments save, an artist, a freelance author, an IT representative, a freelance photo designer, etc.
A sole owner—additionally called a sole trader or a proprietorship—is an unincorporated business that has simply one proprietor who will pay private earnings tax on profits earned from the commercial enterprise.
Sole ownership manner distinct possession. it is a possession so entire that no other man or woman has any interest in the assets. someone's ownership is "sole" while no person apart from the character has any interest inside the belongings as owner.
Learn more about sole owner here brainly.com/question/4442710
#SPJ4
Answer:
the ending cash balance is $330,300
Explanation:
The computation of the ending cash balance is shown below:
Ending cash balance = Opening cash balance + Profit
= $270,000 + (9% × $670,000)
= $270,000 + $60,300
= $330,300
We simply added the opening cash balance and the profit so that the ending cash balance could come
Hence, the ending cash balance is $330,300
Answer: a strategic channel alliance
Explanation: In simple words, strategic alliance refers to a business arrangement in which two organisations combine their resources for their mutual benefits.
Under such an arrangement two organisation agrees to combine their activities and efforts for a particular objective but still remain independent as two separate entities.
Such alliances are generally evident in situation where companies wants to exploit foreign markets. Hence from the above we can conclude that the arrangement between general mills and nestle is a strategic alliance.
Answer:
Net income decreased by $4,850,000.
Explanation:
Given total overhead applied = $48000000
The actual overhead = $52850000
Over/under Applied overhead = total overhead applied - Actual overhead at the end of the year.
Over / under Applied overhead = 48000000-52850000
Over / under Applied overhead = -$4850000
From the calculation, it can be seen that the overhead is underapplied therefore when under applied overhead allocated to cost of goods sold then cost of goods sold decreased by $4850000.
