Answer:
cash dividends: 3,000
Explanation:
We can solve for cash dividends based on how the equity method works:
Beginning investing
+ proportional net income
<u>- cash dividends received </u>
Ending investing
beginning + inomce - dividends = ending
10,000 + 4,000 - cash dividends = 11,000
cash dividends= 14,000 - 11,000
cash dividends = 3,000
when received, the journal entry for the dividends was as follow:
cash 3,000 debit
investing 3,000 credit
to record cash received from investment
Answer:
the amount that the company have to borrow is $160,000
Explanation:
The computation of the amount that the company have to borrow is given below:
= Minimum cash balance at end of the month - (beginning cahs balance + cash receipts - cash disbursement)
= $400000 - $(480000+304000-544000)
= $160,000
hence, the amount that the company have to borrow is $160,000
Answer:
E) 4.96%
Explanation:
The computation of the APR could be determined by applying the RATE formula i.e. shown below:
Given that
PMT = $402.18
Present value = $25,000
NPER = 6 × 12 = 72
FUture value = $0
The formula is shown below:
=RATE(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;TYPE)
After applying the above formula, the annual percentage rate of the loan is
= 0.4135% × 12
= 4.96%
hence, the correct option is E.
Explanation:
Let’s explore one by one as proposed:
An oil cartel raises oil prices: all prices in the oil-related products will increase making it more expensive for companies to be able to afford employees. As the US economy is heavily based on oil import and consumption, the unemployment rate (let´s call it UR from now on) would increase. Countries that export more than import could benefit from this scenario.
The U.S. dollar gains value against foreign currencies: It would be more expensive to produce goods in the US as its currency becomes stronger. Hence companies could choose to produce overseas, increasing the UR. One of the factors that attract investments is a cheap currency, meaning that a company could operate there at lower costs than anywhere else.
American consumers expect higher income in the future: As fights about average salary would arise between employees and companies, igniting even sindicalization, its proper to think that the same as above could occur; companies could choose to produce overseas in countries less demanding of labor rights and income, such as China provinces (I would recommend for you to watch American Factory, a awarded Netflix documentary about that subject).
Brazil experiences economic growth and increases its demand for U.S. exports: as I said in the first alternative, a country that has increased or more expensive exports could benefit from that creating more jobs, in this case decreasing the UR. If Brazil demands more US products, more has to be produced by the country, which would mean more people employed in this attractive sector.
U.S. real estate values rise: to be honest, it only affects indirectly. As housing becomes more expensive, people have to work more to be able to afford housing. That would mean they seeking better-paying jobs or in the absence of those being homeless of at least unable to buy a home. We could argue that the UR would decrease because it becomes more expensive to afford housing and hence people would migrate more but that’s a long shot rationale.
Hi, you've asked an incomplete question. However, the missing question read;
Version 1: George walks away. He never talks to Elaine or Jerry again.
Version 2: George confronts Elaine, saying “I am angry about what you have been saying. I do not want you spreading rumors about me. If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
Version 3: George yells at Elaine to shut u.p and then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired.
Version 4: George demands that Elaine tell him where she heard that. Elaine tells him not to worry about it and tries to crack a joke about how much the boss is late.
Answer:
- <u>Version 1: non-confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 2: cooperative</u>
- <u>Version 3: confrontational</u>
- <u>Version 4: confrontational and cooperative</u>
Explanation:
1. In this scenario it is evident that George avoids confrontation with Elaine. In fact, we are told that "[He] walks away..."
2. In this scenario, however, we notice a cooperative deposition between George and Elaine. He made this lear when he said, "...If you have a problem, please see me about it.”
3. Confrontation occurs in this scenario as we are told that "George... then confronts his boss demanding to know why he’s going to be fired. "
4. By demanding "that Elaine tells him where she heard that" indicates confrontation. While Elaine's cracking a joke about how much the boss is late shows cooperation.
