1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ANEK [815]
1 year ago
5

According to the article, how did the Magna Carta restrict the power of the king? What benefit did the nobles receive from restr

icting the king?
Social Studies
2 answers:
Olin [163]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:

evert thing

Explanation:

APAP

user100 [1]1 year ago
4 0

Magna Carta was issued in June 1215 and was the first document to put into writing the principle that the king and his government were not above the law. It sought to prevent the king from exploiting his power, and placed limits on royal authority by establishing law as a power in itself.

Protected nobles' privileges, upheld their authority, gave nobles equal treatment under the law, gave nobles the right to a trial by peers, and limited the power of the monarchs.

You might be interested in
The metropolitan museum of art acquired its first object, a roman sarcophagus, before it even had a building in which to exhibit
Sonbull [250]
<span>The Met acquired its first object, a Roman sarcophagus, two years before it even had a building in which to exhibit it. So it's True </span>
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
19. True or False: Diversity is the same thing as equal employment opportunity (EEC) and affirmative action
Vlad [161]
The answer is False!
6 0
2 years ago
Suppose you are a freshmen in college and you have not declared a major. One reason you enrolled at your respective college was
san4es73 [151]

Answer:

Procrastinator

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Define entrepreneurship.​
Sergeeva-Olga [200]

Explanation:

The activity of setting up a business or businesses, taking on financial risks in the hope of profit is called enterprenurship

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In 2003, the Supreme Court ruled on two different University of Michigan cases related to affirmative action. They ruled that it
9966 [12]

Answer: Constitutional, unconstitutional.

Explanation:

In Grutter v. Bollinger, the Supreme Court of the United States judged that the student admissions process can constitutionally favor underrepresented minority groups as long as race is not the only factor considered.

Gratz v. Bollinger ruled a points-based admissions policy that granted bonus points to minority applicants, unconstitutional since it was breaking the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is the prisoner's dilemma? (sociology)
    9·2 answers
  • When she was a child, anna's home was wrecked by a tornado and her neighbor was killed. more than 30 years later, she is still t
    10·2 answers
  • PLEASE HELP!!! ILL MAKE YOU BRAINLKYEST!! 1. How could John Adams defend the British soldiers but still be seen as a Patriot? A.
    11·2 answers
  • White ethnics have been completely assimilated into American society.<br> a. true<br> b. false
    12·1 answer
  • Offer any 4 appropriate suggestions to make your society an ideal one.​
    11·1 answer
  • What issue did the Missouri Compromise resolve, and what did it fail to resolve?
    14·1 answer
  • Hello everyone I hope you are having a wonderful day I need help could you give me some personifications about new york city and
    6·1 answer
  • What is a traditional career?
    10·2 answers
  • From an existential perspective, what is the key question with which every individual<br> is faced?
    11·1 answer
  • Heterogeneity of childhood conduct disorder: further evidence of a subtype of conduct disorder linked to bipolar disorder
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!