The answer is no, the person who acts in a manner that is very annoying but not threatening can't be liable for the infliction of emotional distress because in order to inflict emotional distress, the person should be threatening and not just plainly annoying towards others.
I believe the answer is: <span>subtractive bilingualism
</span><span>subtractive bilingualism refers to a process of adding a second language with the expense of reducing the fluency of the first language.
This type of language acquirement is very common among immigrants that have to adapt to a new society that is very different with their origins.</span>
Answer:I don’t know what u mean by that do u want me to study a crossword for u or something lol
Explanation: