The formula for the area of a triangle is Area=.5(b)(h)
So fill in what you know:
120=.5b*15
Then solve for b.
120=7.5b
b=16
Answer:
see explanation
Step-by-step explanation:
the perimeter is the sum of the 3 sides of the triangle
add the parts of the ratio 21 + 8 + 14 = 43
divide the perimeter by 43 to find the value of one part of the ratio
= 5 ft ← 1 part of the ratio, hence
21 parts = 21 × 5 = 105 ft
8 parts = 8 × 5 = 40 ft
14 parts = 14 × 5 = 70 ft
the 3 sides of the triangle are 105 ft, 40 ft and 70 ft
Answer:
Ex = - 4 + 14xy
Ey = 7x² - 7z²
Ez = -14yz
Step-by-step explanation:
The relationship between Electric field Er(x, y, z) and Electric potential, V, is a differential relationship:
Er(x, y, z) = -dV/dr(x, y, z)
Where r(x, y, z) = distance in x, y and z components.
The x component of the electric field is:
Ex = -dV/dx
Given that:
V = 4x - 7x²y + 7yz²
Ex = -dV/dx
Ex = -(4 - 14xy)
Ex = -4 + 14xy
The y component of the electric field is:
Ey = -dV/dy
Ey = -(-7x² + 7yz²)
Ey = 7x² - 7z²
The z component of the electric field is:
Ez = -dV/dz
Ez = -(14yz)
Ez = -14yz
This question is in reverse (in two ways):
<span>1. The definition of an additive inverse of a number is precisely that which, when added to the number, will give a sum of zero. </span>
<span>The real problem, in certain fields, is usually to show that for all numbers in that field, there exists an additive inverse. </span>
<span>Therefore, if you tell me that you have a number, and its additive inverse, and you plan to add them together, then I can tell you in advance that the sum MUST be zero. </span>
<span>2. In your question, you use the word "difference", which does not work (unless the number is zero - 0 is an integer AND a rational number, and its additive inverse is -0 which is the same as 0 - the difference would be 0 - -0 = 0). </span>
<span>For example, given the number 3, and its additive inverse -3, if you add them, you get zero: </span>
<span>3 + (-3) = 0 </span>
<span>However, their "difference" will be 6 (or -6, depending which way you do the difference): </span>
<span>3 - (-3) = 6 </span>
<span>-3 - 3 = -6 </span>
<span>(because -3 is a number in the integers, then it has an additive inverse, also in the integers, of +3). </span>
<span>--- </span>
<span>A rational number is simply a number that can be expressed as the "ratio" of two integers. For example, the number 4/7 is the ratio of "four to seven". </span>
<span>It can be written as an endless decimal expansion </span>
<span>0.571428571428571428....(forever), but that does not change its nature, because it CAN be written as a ratio, it is "rational". </span>
<span>Integers are rational numbers as well (because you can always write 3/1, the ratio of 3 to 1, to express the integer we call "3") </span>
<span>The additive inverse of a rational number, written as a ratio, is found by simply flipping the sign of the numerator (top) </span>
<span>The additive inverse of 4/7 is -4/7 </span>
<span>and if you ADD those two numbers together, you get zero (as per the definition of "additive inverse") </span>
<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = 0/7 = 0 </span>
<span>If you need to "prove" it, you begin by the existence of additive inverses in the integers. </span>
<span>ALL integers each have an additive inverse. </span>
<span>For example, the additive inverse of 4 is -4 </span>
<span>Next, show that this (in the integers) can be applied to the rationals in this manner: </span>
<span>(4/7) + (-4/7) = ? </span>
<span>common denominator, therefore you can factor out the denominator: </span>
<span>(4 + -4)/7 = ? </span>
<span>Inside the bracket is the sum of an integer with its additive inverse, therefore the sum is zero </span>
<span>(0)/7 = 0/7 = 0 </span>
<span>Since this is true for ALL integers, then it must also be true for ALL rational numbers.</span>
Yes she can find the average colour by adding up all the amount of colors by how many colors there are.
