Answer:slander
Explanation:Slander refers to oral defamation, in which a person spread lies about another person , these lies are very likely to ruin the reputation of this other person who is being defamed. Slander ranges from saying that a person has malicious disease , or telling people that someone has committed a crime , these are the obvious ones which may lead to punitive damages but most of them are hard to prove in court. When someone says something untrue about someone else on TV or radio, this is not considered slander but libel , because it is considered to be a written defamation based on the fact that this reaches many audience in the same way as published news.
Answer:
Hello, I’m sorry I can’t identify this person with that picture, can you take the picture again but clearer? Sorry.
Explanation:
This question is missing the answer choices. I was able to find the complete question. Since the passage is the same, I will omit it:
. . . this scenario illustrates:
A. the overjustification effect
B. the outgroup homogeneity effect
C. the bystander effect
D. the continued influence effect
Answer:
The scenario illustrates:
B. the outgroup homogeneity effect.
Explanation:
Ida's beliefs about her own team and the rival team are a typical example of the outgroup homogeneity effect. This effect can be described as a perception of diversity when it comes to one's own group but of homogeneity when it comes to other groups. In other words, a person would perceive members belonging to other groups, such as a rival team, as being more similar to one another. Notice that Ida sees the rival team's members to be "alike in all aspects" while her own team's members are "more diverse in terms of skill, experience, and possessing game strategies."
Answer:
Many Anti-Federalists preferred a weak central government because they equated a strong government with British tyranny. Others wanted to encourage democracy and feared a strong government that would be dominated by the wealthy. They felt that the states were giving up too much power to the new federal government
Explanation: