Hello that would be roanoke and cape cod. finding new resources andescaping religiou persecution
Answer:
c. led a successful communist revolution in China.
Explanation:
Mao Zedong was a Chinese politician and dictator, the top leader of the Communist Party of China (CCP) and founder of the People's Republic of China. Under his leadership, the Communist Party took power in mainland China in 1949, when the new People's Republic was proclaimed, after the victory in the Chinese Revolution against the forces of the Republic of China. The communist victory caused the escape of Chiang Kai-shek and his followers of the Kuomintang to Taiwan and made Mao the top leader in China until his death in 1976. The Mao stage of government was characterized by intense campaigns of ideological reaffirmation, which would cause great social and political upheavals in China, such as the Great Leap Forward and especially the Cultural Revolution, at which time its power reached the highest levels as an intense Personality cult around his figure. Even today, Mao's historical role is surrounded by great controversy.
Answer:
Correct answer is <em>"tyranny, poverty, disease and war."</em>
Explanation:
Kennedy said this in his inaugural address in 1961 expressing his desire to stop this things to happen to human kind.
According to him, therefore it is necessary to create a global alliance, so that the people could together fight off all of these pestilences.
Question:
Why do you think Lincoln didn't end slavery in the north?
Answer:
The proclamation didn't end slavery because it didn't affect the border slave states that weren't in rebellion, and it had no immediate effect in most of the deep South because, at least on the day it was issued, the slaves were in territory still controlled by the Confederacy.
Explanation:
Abraham Lincoln did believe that slavery was morally wrong, but there was one big problem: It was sanctioned by the highest law in the land, the Constitution. The nation’s founding fathers, who also struggled with how to address slavery, did not explicitly write the word “slavery” in the Constitution, but they did include key clauses protecting the institution, including a fugitive slave clause and the three-fifths clause, which allowed Southern states to count enslaved people for the purposes of representation in the federal government.
In a three-hour speech in Peoria, Illinois, in the fall of 1854, Lincoln presented more clearly than ever his moral, legal and economic opposition to slavery—and then admitted he didn’t know exactly what should be done about it within the current political system.
Abolitionists, by contrast, knew exactly what should be done about it: Slavery should be immediately abolished, and freed enslaved people should be incorporated as equal members of society. They didn’t care about working within the existing political system, or under the Constitution, which they saw as unjustly protecting slavery and enslavers. Leading abolitionist William Lloyd Garrison called the Constitution “a covenant with death and an agreement with Hell,” and went so far as to burn a copy at a Massachusetts rally in 1854.
-Alan Becker
