The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Here is my story.
Our new English teacher walked into the classroom and he did not look happy.
For a brief moment, a "deep silence" could be felt in the classroom.
*No, another one like this!" was the first thing it came to my mind.
"Another Mr. Robinson," Charlie said.
And the issue was that we, as a classroom, do not have the best "magnet" to attract young, happy, and easy-going teachers. Quite the opposite. Wea reused to get 19th-century kid of old-fashion teachers that are very strict, probably in the military-style way.
Nothing really to brag about.
It seemed that the new teacher was expecting to find a classroom full of Shakespeare writers, but no, his expectation felt short. No Shakespeares. Just a bunch of good boys and girls who wh¿ant to learn, have good grades and move on.
Those against prohibition believed it hurt their culture and would take away rights.
Prohibition was opposed by many new immigrant groups where drinking was a part of their culture and their religion (especially Catholics). It was targeted at lower classes as well taking away the one leisure activity many of them could afford--going to the bar. Owners of alcohol industries argued it would hurt the economy taking away the tax on alcohol and the government didn't have the right to take away the drink.
In the United States, the United States Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land.
Answer:
On appeal, their case reached the Supreme Court as Worcester v. Georgia (1832), and the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was "a distinct political community" within which Georgia law had no force. The Georgia law was therefore unconstitutional.
Explanation:
I hope that this answer has helped you to understand your question. If you have any further questions, please put them below.
Have a great rest of your day/night!
