Answer:
The Sedition Act was not constitutional. The first amendment of the Constitution protected peoples' right to freedom of speech. It allowed people the freedom to practice different religions, to report events, to speak out against the government, and more. The Sedition Act went directly against the first amendment by making it illegal to speak out against the government.
Explanation:
The first amendment of the constitution is this:
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."
He led Virginia patriots during the American Revolution, and his concept of inalienable rights influenced Thomas Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. As a member of the Constitutional Convention, Mason advocated strong local government and a weak central government. This led to the adoption of the Bill of Rights.
Answer: Neutral
Explanation:
An atom having equal electrons and protons, this makes it have an equal number of positive and negative electric charges. When the situation is such there is going to be zero charge of electric charge, making the atom to be neutral.
Globalization affects my life because of animals. The more people you have the more food you need and a lot of people eat things like cows and pigs. When people move on to different animals I have a HUGE issue
Answer: e. c and d
Explanation:
Smith engaging in riskier actions or investments will mean that Smith has a higher probability of earning either a higher or lower income.
When investing in a risky investment, there will be a higher return attached to it. This is why Corporate bonds yield more than Treasury bonds. The higher risk is to compensate the investor (in this case Smith) for engaging in riskier behavior. If the investment is successful, the return will be paid meaning Smith gets a higher income than Jones who did not take the risk.
When investing in a risky investment, one must still remember that there is a reason the investment is considered risky. There is a higher chance that it will not pay out. Therefore, should Smith engage in more risk and it does not work out, Smith will earn a lower income than Jones who did not invest in the risky investment.
